User talk:Soca1zim

Welcome
Hi, Soca1zim. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like it here and decide to stick around. If you see something on Wikipedia that you want to change, just press the edit button and change it!

For the basic principles, see the five pillars of Wikipedia. And if you're ready to make some edits, this Wikipedia cheatsheet may come in handy.

Cheers, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation


I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sialoblastoma. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's an example of how to add references: Chzz is 98 years old.&lt;ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. &lt;/ref>

He likes tea.&lt;ref> Smith, John. " Interview with Chzz", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Sialoblastoma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Hallows AG ( talk ) 01:06, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Hi there
Regarding your message on my talk page: You should be able to place the photo by adding "" (without the quotation marks) I've added a sample photo at the right If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at my talk page.-- Hallows AG ( talk ) 09:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
There are many pages for that but not one simple one I'm afraid. If you need help on certain things, just ask!

Androzaniamy (talk) 13:16, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Try WP:Cheat for a quick reference quide.--Harkey (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Sialoblastoma
Hi! I like your writing! A few of your references in this article were missing PMID links. I thought you might like to know about Template:Cite pmid which makes inserting complete references much easier. When you preview your page, the PMID will appear with a claim that the rest of the reference will be automatically filled in a few minutes. That's only true if by "few minutes" you mean a day or so. Instead, right click on "jump the queue" to open up a new tab. When the new tab finishes loading, you can refresh and check your edit. I did that for you to show you how. There is also a Cite doi template. Stay away from the Cite pmc template, though. It's buggy. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 02:18, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. When you recently edited Ceruminous adenocarcinoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page P63 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Otic Polyp


A tag has been placed on Otic Polyp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 20:58, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Otic Polyp
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:21, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Otic Polyp. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Otic Polyp, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Use your sandbox!!!
Hi again! I saw the speedy delete notice and contested it. Please don't try to remove the tag yourself.

You should do your article creation work in your sandbox. At the top of the page when you log in, you will see "My sandbox". Click on that, and you will find a page on which you can do all of your article creation, which you can copy and paste so that, right from the start, your article has substantive content. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 21:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

I have had trouble with the references linking correctly, so I thought I would host the references first as I was editing, in the hopes they would actually link correctly by the time I was done! Sorry! I won't do that again. Lester D.R. Thompson, M.D. 21:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

That's why I always "jump the queue". Sometimes "a few minutes" means the next day. Besides which, my experience is that about 2% of doi's are bad, and although I've never encountered a bad pmid, my understanding is that a small percentage of them are bad as well. Stigmatella aurantiaca (talk) 10:38, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Hibernoma, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Magnetic resonance and GARP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary like nuclear features


A tag has been placed on Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary like nuclear features requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sports Devotee (talk) 00:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Peripheral ossifying fibroma computed tomography scan.jpg


The file File:Peripheral ossifying fibroma computed tomography scan.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Oral peripheral ossifying fibroma hematoxylin and eosin stain.tif
Thanks for uploading File:Oral peripheral ossifying fibroma hematoxylin and eosin stain.tif, which you've attributed to Spot Insight Digital Camer. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)