User talk:Sochill33

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Jesse Kramer may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. Flowerparty ■ 05:54, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

College Works Painting & College Works
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the College Works Painting and College Works articles, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the articles in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! -- Cactus.man   &#9997;  10:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

link to 3-D
Hello, when you want to link to the article about something 3D, please do not link to 3-D, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as 3D computer graphics by writing out 3-D Regards, -- Jeff3000 22:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Please do not remove content from your talk page; other users will utilize this page as a way of seeing past discussion, and removing things can be seen as disruptive if you appear to be trying to hide something. You may wish to consider archiving old discussions; take a look at the move page if you would like to learn more about moving and renaming articles. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 18:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Please stop removing speedy deletion tags, if you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing. --W(t) 05:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Yea.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Yea.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not violate Wikipedia policy by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. IrishGuy talk 00:38, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. IrishGuy talk 00:44, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Carmen Bryan
Carmen Bryan has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:04, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Lost Tapes 2
The Lost Tapes 2, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that The Lost Tapes 2 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/The Lost Tapes 2 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of The Lost Tapes 2 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. B1atv 17:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Vokle logo small.png
Thank you for uploading File:Vokle logo small.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Zoo Fari  01:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Vokle screenshot.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vokle screenshot.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Zoo Fari  01:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * You iz da man. :)  Hang tight and I'll restore it right away.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rap Rebirth
A tag has been placed on Rap Rebirth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 02:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 02:33, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaylon Hunt
A tag has been placed on Kaylon Hunt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Goodvac  ( talk ) 22:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Kaylon Hunt.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kaylon Hunt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Woogee (talk) 23:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Vokle
I have nominated Vokle, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vokle. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vokle logo small.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Vokle logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Raprebirth screenshot.PNG
Thank you for uploading File:Raprebirth screenshot.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:40, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Large raprebirth logo white.png
Thank you for uploading File:Large raprebirth logo white.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 20:41, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Raprebirth screenshot.PNG, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 20:28, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Reply
S ophie ( Talk ) 20:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zhi Gang Sha


The article Zhi Gang Sha has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Very little independent information here, virtually the whole article sole-sourced to his site, other than the best-seller lists, and there is reason to regard those with suspicion. I have been working on trying to improve this article for some time, with no help, possibly because this guy is actually too obscure.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jimbo Wales (talk) 10:15, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Zhi Gang Sha for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zhi Gang Sha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zhi Gang Sha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Chzz  ► 01:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MotorMood
Hello Sochill33,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MotorMood for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 02:39, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A&R Channel


The article A&R Channel has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unreferenced since created 13 years ago."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MB 18:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)