User talk:SocialMatching

A tag has been placed on SocialMatching, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DancingMan 23:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit(s) to List of social networking websites
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to List of social networking websites has been reverted; please only place entries there that are internal links to actual Wikipedia articles about notable social networking sites. External links, redlinks, substubs, non-notable sites or things that are not social networking sites will be removed. Please see WP:WEB for information on notability for websites on Wikipedia. If you have questions, use the talk page. Your future editing experience will be better advanced by using the sandbox. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) (eds) 23:21, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

My concern about your username (SocialMatching)
Hello, SocialMatching, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Admins usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * If you decide to just go ahead and change your username, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under the new username: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at WP:RFC/NAME. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again! RJASE1 Talk  03:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

List of social networking websites
Hi. Despite my previous post concerning SocialMatching, which is not a Wikipedia article, being added to the above list, I note that you have re-added it. This has once more been reverted. If you have any comments or questions, please post to the talk page for the List, or post to mine where we can discuss any concerns you have. Please do note though that blindly re-submitting deleted non-article links may be viewed as vandalism or spamming by some editors. I would advise you to refrain from this. Thanks. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) (eds) 11:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)