User talk:Socialanimal7

Criticism of Islam
Welcome to the Wikipedia. As a new editor, you might want to familiarize yourself with some of the Wikipedia's policies, particularly the ones regarding neutral point of view, notability and assuming good faith. Another one worth noting is the three revert rule: other editors tend to take edit-warring very seriously. If you believe that your addition to Criticism of Islam is justified, please take your case to the article's talk page and seek a consensus. TechBear &#124; Talk &#124; Contributions 17:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history at Criticism of Islam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:27, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

How about blocking the person who was deleting my article for no reason...? This is supposed to be a article on criticism of Islam....it seems most of the content is Pro-Islam...


 * You were given a reason, multiple times, that your addition violated WP:UNDUE, which you decided to ignore rather than discuss, electing instead to continue disrupting the article after being reverted by more than one editor. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:43, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Islam has been proven to be a forgery...Do you know what freedom of speech is? And why does the article that is supposed to be criticizing Islam seem like it was written by pro-islamic editors? I have contacted your superiors as well as my friends at wired magazine...I made sure to include your information, wikipedia isn't going to be to happy about having you as a representative....good luck...your going to need it.