User talk:Socialinequalken

Welcome!
Hello, Socialinequalken, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! S.G.(GH) ping! 19:55, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Getting Started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Defense and Related Incidents


A tag has been placed on Defense and Related Incidents requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 220  of  Borg 20:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

A mistake?
Hi Socialinequalken. It looks as if you created this by mistake so I have deleted it. The content is currently the same as on your user page. Please let me know if you have any queries. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 20:48, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Ah crap. My mistake. If you still need the text you can find it below:

The response from the university is that the balloon thrown on Wednesday 2013 appears to have been filled with water, and they are sending clothing and pieces of the balloon away for further forensic testing. Authorities claim that they are having difficulty verifying that this is racially motivated because there are reports that claim that non-minority students have been hit also but the fact remains that a majority of students targeted have indeed been minority. Sources who were interviewed by the Huffington Post who wished to be remain anonymous claimed that as early as 2007, that they saw bleach-filled balloons dropped on groups of women participating in sorority rush. They also claimed that bleach-bombing incidents are common and may occur "maybe once or twice a month."

SmartSE (talk) 20:50, 18 November 2013 (UTC)