User talk:Socialresearch

Welcome!
I noticed that you have recently been adding external links to articles. It may be useful to peruse Wikipedia's external link policy to see what should be added and what should not. If you have any questions, I am more than happy to help! +A.0u 23:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marina DeBris


A tag has been placed on Marina DeBris requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 15:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Marina DeBris. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Best regards,  Cind.   amuse  (Cindy) 16:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Notability
The name was removed pending the outcome of this which is what the article looked like at the time it was removed from Found art -. Before adding names of individuals please familiarize yourself with wikipedia policies and guidelines Policies and guidelines. This is also important to learn - Notability - good luck...Modernist (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Further questions, because I'm still unclear. These artists Gustavo Aguerre,Tolleck Winner have only one reference and very short bios, and these artists Guillaume Bijl, Tom Friedman, Rodney McMillian, Joe Rush, Tomoko Takahashi have no references and also short bios, so how are these artists notable? What criteria are used to judge these artists notable? I'm not saying these artists are not notable, but I'm asking for standard criteria that are applied to all artists equally. Why these and not Marina DeBris, who has more to her bio and more citations. What makes the difference?Socialresearch (talk) 04:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
- and if you need any further help, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

YouTube as a source
Normally it's not allowed. But if it's an official channel (say WWE.com's YouTube channel) then it can be accepted. Gorlack36 (talk) 13:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Marina DeBris Hoop Trash Dress.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Marina DeBris Hoop Trash Dress.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Muzeo Museum, Anaheim (June 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Muzeo&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new reviewer's talk page].
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Women Environmental Artists Directory concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Women Environmental Artists Directory, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Muzeo Museum, Anaheim


Hello Socialresearch. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Muzeo Museum".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Letch (February 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Letch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Simon_Letch Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaMona&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Simon_Letch reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 04:03, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Simon Letch has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Simon Letch. Thanks! LaMona (talk) 04:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Letch


Hello, Socialresearch. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Simon Letch".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

The Holocaust
This is to let you know about the discretionary sanctions that uninvolved admins are able to apply to this area. Note that the template is purely informational. SarahSV (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Pitt (June 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen Pitt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Helen Pitt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Helen_Pitt Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Helen_Pitt reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:57, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Helen Pitt has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Helen Pitt. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Helen Pitt (October 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Helen Pitt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Helen_Pitt Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightenbelle&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Helen_Pitt reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 15:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for the comments. I'm not really clear on what you mean when you say the sources are connected to the subject closely. The sources include Allen And Unwin Book Publishers, The Sydney Institute, ABC National Radio, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, BBC News, Women of Influence. It seems to me that all these sources are independent of her.
 * I'm also not clear on what you mean in saying "provide significant coverage of the author". Several sources review Helen Pitt's book, for example: Salvo, Natalie. "Book Review: Helen Pitt's The House is an exhilarating look at the Opera House's colourful & dramatic history". This seem to me to be significant coverage of Ms Pitt. These sources are about a book -she- wrote. Also, several of the sources were interviews -with- Helen Pitt. See references 9 and 10. By the way, neither of these organizations doing the interviews are connected with her. These sources all focus specifically on her or her book. She is the focus.
 * Would you please give me more information about how these sources might be considered to be closely connected with Ms. Pitt, or how these don't provide significant coverage of her?
 * Thank you.
 * Gene Socialresearch (talk) 03:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Helen Pitt
Hello, Socialresearch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Helen Pitt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Helen Pitt


Hello, Socialresearch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Helen Pitt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)