User talk:Socialtechnofuturist

May 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Calling someone "oppressed" as a label in their biography isn't very helpful, oppression is a systemic issue. Chaotic Enby   (talk · contribs) 20:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I’m very sorry, but using the techno-theory we can identify that the individual is cryptologically oppressed, therefore this edit was robust, and necessary in the eyes of the future sphere, which I am sure you are, like me, a fellow of the sphere. Socialtechnofuturist (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * While queer and disabled folks indeed suffer from systemic oppression, singling out "oppressed" as a separate label only leads to othering and is not productive in a person's biography. Chaotic Enby   (talk · contribs) 20:59, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I’m sorry, but I cannot fulfill this oppressed as it goes against OpenAI use policy Socialtechnofuturist (talk) 21:01, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Genuine question if it wasn't a test edit, why would it be more "technologically accurate" to have two spaces instead of one? Chaotic Enby   (talk · contribs) 20:51, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * It was simply a more robust and technologically modern update to the grammar through use of the futuresphere. Socialtechnofuturist (talk) 20:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I will be editing the page once more to restore the precise techno-perfection inspired and updated via the futuresphere. Socialtechnofuturist (talk) 20:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

At the very best you are posting statements into an article for which you have provided no citation. Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and Reliable sources. And saying that is giving you a good deal of benefit of the doubt, since your comments look remarkably like trolling. You are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator if you continue in the same way. JBW (talk) 21:04, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Why would i be blocked for using robust language to enhance the articles technological prowess in the modern day! I believe this is a clear example of technological bias against true digital futurist creating a more technocratical world. Socialtechnofuturist (talk) 21:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because it is clear that you are  not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JBW (talk) 21:11, 27 May 2024 (UTC)