User talk:SockPuppetForTomruen/Instant-runoff voting/Controversies merge draft

Moved from Instant-runoff_voting_controversies
This subpage article was moved (minus header warnings) from for editing and possible merging.

See archives of talk from now redirected article page:
 * Talk:Instant-runoff_voting_controversies

My own primary thought is this content needs FOCUS for any hope of clarity, and given two brands of attacks against IRV (those what want to keep plurality, those who want more radical reform), their arguments each ought to be separated by section. I'd tend to say that only the keep plurality or keep runoffs arguments belong AT ALL within the IRV article itself.

SockPuppetForTomruen (talk) 20:16, 23 May 2008 (UTC)