User talk:SodaliteMalachite

Welcome!
Hello, SodaliteMalachite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as 2015–16 North American winter, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dustin ( talk ) 15:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of 2015–16 North American winter


The article 2015–16 North American winter has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is literally no significant information yet and will not likely be for over a month. This article was deleted for similar months when a new user attempted to create it even earlier when in the summer. All this can amount to for awhile is a stub containing information that many or most people already knew about. We should wait for the official forecasts to come out.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dustin ( talk ) 15:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015–16 North American winter for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015–16 North American winter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2015–16 North American winter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dustin ( talk ) 20:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ridiculously Resilient Ridge


A tag has been placed on Ridiculously Resilient Ridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"There are no original sources for this term. It hinges on one person's offhand comments within blogs and in a refereed article which does not contain a complete definition."

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

October 2019
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Turn Up the Music (Chris Brown song), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 18:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Doctorhawkes. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Heaven (Bryan Adams song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

First of all, how do I use the sandbox? Second, is listing songs that are simply categorized "Rock" and giving them at least a proper subgenre on my sandbox a good idea? Also, the main reason why I've categorized both Tom Petty's "Refugee" and Bruce Springsteen's "Glory Days" as Heartland Rock instead of "Rock" is because not only do both of the aforementioned songs sound like it upon listening closely to them, but both of the aforementioned musicians were known to be notable Heartland Rock performers. I'm sorry, but just "Rock" isn't gonna cut it for me because it's not specific enough for my strict music genre standards; same thing goes to songs that go simply by "Country", "House", or "EDM". Thank you for your time. SodaliteMalachite (talk) 03:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC–06:00)
 * Not to be rude, but it doesn't matter whether it cuts it for you. Any unsourced additions will probably be reverted, which I suspect has already happened to most things you have added to Wikipedia. Genres need a reliable source to be added. See WP:RS. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2023
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Hemiauchenia (talk) 00:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)