User talk:Soerenwalls

A tag has been placed on Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Meaning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. eaolson (talk) 01:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Please read WP:OR. You may not insert your personal research or opinion into Wikipedia articles. Corvus cornix talk  01:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
The recent edit you made to Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Loren.wilton (talk) 01:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC))

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Loren.wilton (talk) 01:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Meaning listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Meaning. Since you had some involvement with the Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious Meaning redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Amaryllis Gardener  talk 22:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)