User talk:Sofi.97.05

Nomination of Horse shampoo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horse shampoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Horse shampoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 15:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Horse shampoo


A tag has been placed on Horse shampoo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 15:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shampoo for horses


A tag has been placed on Shampoo for horses, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  Tentinator   18:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Shampoo for horses, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Vianello (Talk) 18:35, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I have redirected the article to shampoo, like horse shampoo was. It was largely promotional in nature. And for the record, you can't use the ref tags to link to other Wikipedia articles, like this: ; this breaks the article. Instead, use the following syntax: shampoo; this yields shampoo. (The ref tags are used to create citations of off-Wikipedia sources; obviously, Wikipedia can't recursively use itself as a reference. See the citing sources guideline.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)