User talk:Softground

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Verden Allen, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Verden Allen was changed by Softground (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86059 on 2010-12-20T09:34:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Sourcing
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions to Verden Allen. I have reverted it to an earlier version for now, simply because the content is entirely unsourced. Two of our core content policies are "verifiability" and "no original research". We are particularly careful with sourcing for information in articles about living people. The content you added also included direct quotations. Per policy, we are not permitted to incorporate direct quotations unless we directly cite the sources.

You are welcome to readd the content (which is all in history) along with the sources that substantiate the content. Again, please do not restore the quotes unless you fully cite them. See Citing sources for more information.

As an aside, I will also note that the image you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons to add to the article is up for deletion as it does not contain information on its copyright status. It has also for that reason been removed, though it may be restored if the copyright concerns are satisfied there. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. I'm afraid that your relationship with Verden Allen does not make any difference; if anything, we would in that case discourage you from editing his article at all (see our "conflict of interest" guidelines), but if you do edit his article, you must ensure that your edits meet our core content policies of verifiability, neutrality and no original research. I have since leaving the above note discovered, too, that you are utilizing text directly from . I'm afraid that this content is not compatibly licensed with Wikipedia; we cannot accept copyrighted content from other websites without verifying permission from the copyright holders. See Donating copyrighted materials. If permission is supplied, we may be able to utilize some of the text from this page, but it will not resolve the problems with the other core policies. The content still must meet those. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dressed To Kill : A Kiss tribute band


A tag has been placed on Dressed To Kill : A Kiss tribute band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Minima c  ( talk ) 15:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Verden Allen
Hi, please stop trying to add back the picture. It has been deleted (presumably for copyright-violation) but you'd need to check with an administrator. In any case it no longer exists on Wikipedia.--Egghead06 (talk) 11:34, 25 May 2011 (UTC)