User talk:Soho601

File:Natasha Rhodes Author.jpg needs authorship information
Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Natasha Rhodes Author.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).


 * If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the own template.


 * If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Reply to Sfan00 IMG (talk)

I'm a new Wikipedia user - can you tell me where on the file description page to insert the recommended text: Soho601 (talk) (Uploads) ?

Thanks in advance for your help,

Soho601 (talk) 22:32, 21 October 2021 (UTC) user:Soho610

File:Natasha Rhodes.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Natasha Rhodes.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of CyberCoders for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CyberCoders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CyberCoders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —&#8239; The Earwig (talk) 03:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)