User talk:Sokol Marku

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Albanian Geological Survey article
Thank you for creating the above article! It's always good to see new articles, and new editors!

However, the article needs some work before it would be counted as up to the standards which are expected of a Wikipedia article. But this should not stop it being here!

There are a couple of things that I feel that the article needs to help make sure that it becomes an article which would be suitable to remain on Wikipedia:
 * 1) It needs some mention of notability: what makes the AGS special? Why it is important?
 * 2) It needs some citations - that is, references on reliable websites or in publically-available publications.

I don't now anything about the AGS - although if it helps I have found a couple of links which might be of use (or they might not!) for helping flesh out the article: and there are others at:
 * IST World's details of the AGS
 * Geological Survey of Albania
 * Google search for Albanian Geological Survey

Please note that we cannot use copyrighted material - but these could form the basis of information for the article.

Although I do not know anything about the AGS, I know a little bit about writing articles - so if you want any help, contact me. To do this, just click on the "Contact Me" link on my signature that appears at the end of this section!

Regards, --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 14:07, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Logo anglisht.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo anglisht.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Skier Dude ►  04:30, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Sokol Marku! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Teki Biçoku -

Speedy deletion nomination of Fjalor i Gjeologjise


A tag has been placed on Fjalor i Gjeologjise requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Inks.LWC (talk) 06:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fjalor i Gjeologjise


The article Fjalor i Gjeologjise has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The article cites no sources, and from my investigations, I could not find any reliable sources via Google that show that this is a book that meets the notability requirements for books (WP:NBOOK)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 22:03, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Fjalor i Gjeologjise for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fjalor i Gjeologjise is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fjalor i Gjeologjise until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Inks.LWC (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2011 (UTC)