User talk:Sokolowpaulina

Copyright policies
Hello, Sokolowpaulina.

Thank you for your interest in donating material from {http://www.clusternetwork.eu/read.php?id=64,65 to Wikipedia. Since we do not currently have a method in place to verify the identity of account holders at account creation, we must verify such donations through external processes. The content has been removed until that verification process is completed; please do not restore it yourself.

The simplest way to verify is to place a release on that external website putting the material into public domain or co-licensing it under CC-BY-SA and GFDL, which permit modification and reuse, even commercially, as long as authorship credit is given. This release is irrevocable and must continue to be displayed, or the material may need to be removed. A statement such as the following would be sufficient: "The contents of this website (or page, if you are specifically releasing one section) are available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License 3.0 and the GNU Free Documentation License, unversioned with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts." If you decide to take this route, please put a link to that release on Talk:Tensta Konsthall so we can restore the contents.

Alternatively, you may choose to send an e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL. There is a boilerplate release form at Declaration of consent for all enquiries which can be helpful. Please provide a clear link to the website in your e-mail and specify by name the articles on Wikipedia in which the material is being used. Once your e-mail is received and processed by a member of the Communications Committee, the article's contents will be restored if your release is legally sufficient.

As copyright is a matter of legal concern, we must ensure that we not only protect the rights of copyright holders, but also guard the Wikipedia project against inadvertent infringement.

I also need to let you know that, even if the content is licensed, it will need to be reviewed to ensure that is compliant with Wikipedia's requirements for verifiability and neutrality and does not contain "original research". (As you are closely related to the subject matter, you should also read our conflict of interest guidelines.) Even if permission is verified, material may be modified or removed where it is otherwise inconsistent with our policies and guidelines. Wikipedia is not a webhost - our rules and requirements are different from official sources, so what is appropriate for those is generally not suitable for us.

If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to let me know at my talk page or by responding here and adding the following text (curly brackets and all) to your answer:. We also have a help desk which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers.

Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)