User talk:Sol13705

Image has contradictory licensing
Please see Image:WikiLogo3.jpg for the details. Thanks, --WikiSlasher 03:02, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WikiLogo3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WikiLogo3.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Thaurisil 10:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The article Karmacritic.com has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Re Karmacritic.com -- I understand what you were trying to do, and I see that the citations to Karmacritic in On the Lot have since been restored. An article on Karmacritic, though, must stand on its own feet -- the article should not exist only to support another article. That means you need to find independent reliable sources demonstrating that the Karmacritic site is itself notable. See WP:WEB for our guidelines on website notability. Thanks, NawlinWiki 00:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)