User talk:Solaris Biotech

November 2022
 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Drmies (talk) 01:54, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Well, you could start by actually clicking on the link and looking at the user name policy, and you could click on the link to WP:SPAM--but that you were promoting the business is pretty obvious. Drmies (talk) 02:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

What is your connection to the Solaris Biotech Solutions account? 331dot (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 331dot, I can answer that question: the relation is CU-confirmed identity, but that surprises no one., in denying that account's unblock request, said something that I was thinking myself, and hinted at earlier here: the editor simply did not read (or couldn't be bothered to read) our policies, even when they are explicitly linked to them. Drmies (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)