User talk:Solaris Biotech Solutions

≤== November 2022 ==

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. DatGuyTalkContribs 18:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Solaris Biotech Solutions


A tag has been placed on Draft:Solaris Biotech Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.solarisbiotech.com/en/who-we-are. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall talk 19:23, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Solaris Biotech Solutions/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Solaris Biotech Solutions/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.solarisbiotech.com/en/who-we-are. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Finngall talk 19:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Only one unblock request at a time, please. You have to be patient and wait for an administrator to evaluate your request (I am not an administrator). However, I can already tell you that it will be declined for the following reasons:

You should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines and mandatory paid editing disclosure policy. You will not be unblocked so that you can write about your company, at least in the short term. If that is your only interest, then you should instead look for an alternative outlet where this type of writing is permitted. If you would still like to become an individual editor, writing about other topics that are unrelated to your company, then please describe what those topics are. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 23:35, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Your company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. A company must meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable company to be considered worthy of inclusion. For this to happen, we require evidence that the company has already received significant coverage from multiple reliable sources that are independent of the company. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself. Therefore, when you say "We just want to let the company known" - that is promotion.
 * 2) You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia - even if you are the copyright holder, or have the copyright holder's permission - unless the material has been released for use by the verified copyright owner into the public domain or under a license compatible with Wikipedia. These licenses allow anyone — not just Wikipedia — to share, distribute, transmit, and adapt your work, free of charge and in perpetuity, provided that you are attributed as the author. Also, because some derivative works may be commercial, we cannot accept materials that are licensed only for educational use or even for general non-commercial use. Releasing the material is both permanent and irrevocable.
 * 3) Your account name is your company's name, and that violates Wikipedia's username policy. Accounts are for individuals - not companies, organizations or groups of people. Your account must be accessed by only one person who does not share access with anyone else, ever. Your account name must also reflect this individual use.

Please don't use unblock requests to dispute policies. If you want to be a constructive Wikipedia editor, then you will follow the instructions given and make useful edits to topics that are unrelated to your company. Then, after demonstrating that you have the understanding of how Wikipedia works, you can debate the merits of the username policy. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)