User talk:Solarra/Archive Jul

User targeting and vandalizing page
I noticed on the talk page for wikipedia entry Court Bauer that you've corresponded with a user over questionable content that he/she has added. I have had similar problems with this user. User: Sethjohnsonct has repeatedly posted negative and nonsensical content for the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Court_Bauer page. He has not contributed to other pages and appears to be targeting the subject of the wikipedia page, I think. I had updated that page (as always including citations) and within hours the user vandalized it, recklessly deleting edits with proper citations and replaced them with questionable content that isnt cited and not verified. Please advise how to resolve this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkmandude4000 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

bhaap.com Submission
Hi there, since your review I have added 3 independently published references. You had stated that you would approve the submission if only two more independent references were added.

I trust that you will now have enough grounds to approve the Bhaap submission, especially given the comments in your first review. Thanks for your help.

The Match Referee (talk) 09:31, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Hmm
I am curious, how did you get to be an expert in so may subjects and languages, play the violin, and get deeply into Star Trek? Pine✉ 08:43, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Simple. Star Trek inspired me to get involved with the many themes and interests depicted on the show :-)  ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀
 * Interesting! I like Star Trek too. Which show was your favorite? Pine✉ 05:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Copy editing
Do you accept requests? Best, Jona yo!  Selena 4 ever  16:34, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

hey katsy
a friend here :) Maractus (talk) 00:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

AfC
Hello,

I just wanted to stop by to point out that among the "Invalid reasons to decline a submission" in the AfC guidelines are:

"Declining an article because it correctly uses general references to support some or all of the material. The content and sourcing policies require inline citations for only four specific types of material, most commonly: direct quotations and contentious material (whether negative, positive, or neutral) about living persons."

and

"Declining an article because it contains easily solved formatting issues, such as no wikilinks to other articles or no sections, is not acceptable. Instead, fix it yourself, or accept and tag the article to alert other editors to the one or two issues that you believe are the most urgent issues."

Thus, the reasons you gave for declining this article were invalid.

Thanks,

Gold   Standard  21:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Looked at the article and approved it. Lots of cleanup needed but that can be done later :-)  ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀
 * I wasn't exactly saying it should be approved, in fact, it shouldn't have been approved because of the self-published sources. All I was trying to tell you was to find more valid reasons to decline articles, but oh well.   Gold   Standard  18:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Trauma (medicine)/GA1
It has been 7 days and you have not responded at Talk:Trauma (medicine)/GA1. Please begin to address the concerns.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll respond when I can. I have been really busy recently and not able to put alot of time online.  I will fix the issues you raised when I get a chance :-)  ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ Talk ♪  ߷  ♀ Contribs ♀

Technal
Hello Solarra,

To begin, thank you for your help.

I have a problem with my tranlsation of my article Technal. In fact, my article is on line in french and it was accepted by Wikipedia. So I translate the text but it didn't accepted and moreover, the text name is Norsk Hydro whereas my article doesn't name Norsk Hydro...

So I can't delete this article...

I write the article in "my sandbox", what is the process after please ?

Thank you so much for your help, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azul Prueba (talk • contribs) 13:15, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2012 (UTC)