User talk:Soldier of Seljuk 1071

Welcome!
Hi Soldier of Seljuk 1071! I noticed your contributions to Kaykaus I&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Icabobin (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Siege of Germianapolis moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Siege of Germianapolis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more inline citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 22:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Siege of Aydusanc moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Siege of Aydusanc, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from inline reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. —  Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Cilicia Campaign of Baybars (1276), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Gokturklerrr. Thank you. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

I knew the name "Baybars" as Baibars in English. Am I thinking wrong? Soldier of Seljuk 1071 (talk) 13:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Siege of Aydusanc. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Cilicia Campaign of Kaykaus I (1216-1218), you may be blocked from editing. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:01, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

Cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Siege of Aydusanc. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

I think I thought the page had been deleted and recreated it. But when I realized it was a draft, I realized that I had accidentally created two pages. I made the necessary arrangements. I apologize if I'm wrong. Thanks. Soldier of Seljuk 1071 (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. Thank you for creating Cilicia Campaign of Kayqubad the Great (1225). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   02:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Cut and paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Siege of Mut (1225). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:58, 14 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Soldier of Seljuk,
 * You keep doing this! Please stop, you can lose your editing privileges if you continue despite warnings not to. If you disagree with an article move to Draft space, go talk to the editor who moved it or move it back yourself. Stop creating new versions of existing articles. Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Siege of Manavgat moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Siege of Manavgat, is not suitable as written to remain published. Sources do not contain enough information to pass WP:VERIFY -- please see WP:CIT as to what information needs to be included. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  Onel 5969  TT me 10:46, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Siege of Anamur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Anamur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Siege of Anamur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:28, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Siege of Aydos, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 19:01, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Alara


The article Siege of Alara has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources provided fail WP:V; no significant coverage in WP:RS, meaning the article fails WP:GNG. In addition, the article text as given shows no evidence of a 'siege' at all, so the article title has been invented to give the illusion of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taşeli's Invasion


A tag has been placed on Taşeli's Invasion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"Articles for deletion/Siege of Anamur; Redirect was accidentally bundled into the AfD instead of the actual article"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 21:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Surrender of Alara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Surrender of Alara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Surrender of Alara until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cilicia Campaign of Kaykaus I (1216-1218)


The article Cilicia Campaign of Kaykaus I (1216-1218) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Siege of Aydusanc


A tag has been placed on Draft:Siege of Aydusanc, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:44, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Germianapolis
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Germianapolis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Siege of Kayseri (1211–1212) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Kayseri (1211–1212). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and please, also read about verification on Wikipedia. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 14:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Germianapolis


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Germianapolis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Siege of Ankara (1212-1213) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Siege of Ankara (1212-1213), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 10:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Nigde Revolt (1212) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Nigde Revolt (1212), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 10:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Melhama (1218) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Battle of Melhama (1218), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 11:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:First Seljuk-Zengid Crisis (1157)
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:First Seljuk-Zengid Crisis (1157), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Cilician campaign of Kaykaus I for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cilician campaign of Kaykaus I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cilician campaign of Kaykaus I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Seljuk civil war of 1211–1213


The article Seljuk civil war of 1211–1213 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:BEFORE shows no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Mut
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Mut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Mut


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Mut".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 18:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Kayseri (1211–1212)
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Kayseri (1211–1212), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Ankara (1212-1213)
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Ankara (1212-1213), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nigde Revolt (1212)
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nigde Revolt (1212), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Kayseri (1211–1212)


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Kayseri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:37, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nigde Revolt (1212)


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nigde Revolt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Ankara (1212-1213)


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siege of Ankara".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:13, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siegees of Çinçin and Hançin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 20:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Melhama (1218)
Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Melhama (1218), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Melhama (1218)


Hello, Soldier of Seljuk 1071. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Melhama".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 23:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)