User talk:Solidwolf52

AfD nomination of Boren's Syndrome
Boren's Syndrome, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Boren's Syndrome satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Boren's Syndrome and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Boren's Syndrome during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Man It&#39;s So Loud In Here 00:50, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey Solidwolf52, considering that you have only made two edits to Wikipedia so far under this username, I am going to guess that you are a new editor on Wikipedia. I would like to welcome you, but also give you a suggestion for the future.  As you can see here, your article on Boren's syndrome has been nominated for deletion.  Try not to take it personally, this kind of thing is a matter of policy that helps keep Wikipedia's standards up.  While your contributions are encouraged, the problem with the article that you created is one of both size and revelance.  Boren's Syndrome is a pretty minor piece of Halo cannon, with only a small amount of information published about it and not a lot more information likely to be added.  This does not make it irrevelant, but it makes it insufficient for a full article.  It would be better to place information on Boren's Syndrome into other existing articles, such as the one for Sgt Johnson.  Do not let this discourage you from editing, but learn from it how to insert information that is less likely to be deleted or reverted.  Best of luck editing!  - Fearless Son 01:52, 31 October 2007 (UTC)