User talk:SolitudeRain

Welcome!
  Hello, MarkCeline!  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, RangersRus (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Neet Scam 2024 has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Neet Scam 2024. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:21, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neet Scam 2024 (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neet Scam 2024 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Neet_Scam_2024 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Twinkle1990&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Neet_Scam_2024 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 (talk) 14:15, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Adding citations
Hi Mark. You don't need to add ISBNs for every source. I use a button on the toolbar in the main Wikipedia editor to add references, and that adds things like ISBNs automatically where it can. If you're using a PC/laptop/Mac to edit, you can use the same toolbar button. See Help:Footnotes for a good introduction to referencing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:30, 7 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you Curb Safe Charmer MarkCeline (talk) 14:51, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neet Scam 2024 has been accepted
 Neet Scam 2024, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Neet_Scam_2024 help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Ratnahastin (talk) 04:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thank you! MarkCeline (talk) 04:53, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Copyright problem: National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy
Hello MarkCeline! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.news9live.com/education-career/entrance-exams/explained-know-about-neet-cheating-scam-unearthed-at-gujarat-bihar-2533903, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org ] or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)

National Eligibility Cum Entrance Test Controversy
Hey!

I just noticed you add db-author to the above page, however as others have substantually edited it, it doesn't qualify for that criteria. Can you advise what you were trying to achieve? If it's related to the above notice, don't worry about it and learn from these things - we all make mistakes, we'd rather you stuck around, learnt from what went wrong, and improve next time around! There are other routes to deletion of the page, however I don't think it's likely to be deleted through the usual process. Mdann52 (talk) 14:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, @Mdann52. I wanted to delete the article because of the exact reason. I think it's necessary I accept my mistake; I must admit my mistake if I have made one. It was my fault; I should take responsibility. It's alright. I'll come back with a better, more original article next time. But hey, thanks for the message. It helps. I'm glad we talked. Cheers! MarkCeline (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with the article now at all - that's the point of Wikipedia, people write stuff, others come along and help work on it, and things get better! Hope to see another article from you soon! Mdann52 (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2024 (UTC)