User talk:Solivia3/Mtor

Peer Review
The addition of the role that mTOR plays in plants definitely helps to improve the quality of the article. I do think that the article could use a little improvement at the beginning as well. How the previous editor defined mTOR is a bit confusing and could be defined more clearly. Another suggestion I have is to add links to some of the uncommon terminology used, that way readers can easily clink on the word and get a definition for it. For example, adding a link to “kinase complex” may be helpful. There is a clear structure to the article, however, I wonder if it would be better to add a subheading for the paragraph that is above “Role of mTOR in plants”. I think there are a couple grammatical errors, for example, I believe “plants” should be capitalized in the subheading “Role of mTOR in plants”. The sentences “Plants express the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR). Plants have a TOR kinase complex” could be combined into one sentence or reword to make it flow better. You did a great job with balancing the content and using a neutral tone, and you also named your sources. I noticed that a lot of articles on Wikipedia cite after every sentence. I would maybe ask Dr. Parker if that needs to be done or if every few sentences is okay. Would you be able to add a diagram of maybe mTOR in plants or in general? Overall, I think you are on the right path, great job! Cellife (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the peer review! I appreciate your help correcting some of the grammatical errors and mentioning how I have recited a few times. I think I will keep the citations to make sure I cite where it may be needed. I had thought about adding a picture of mTOR in plants but I am concerned to have any issue with copyright and a clear image that can allow for a better understanding of mTOR (specifically in plants). Again, I value your comments on my article and thank you for looking it over. Solivia3 (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2022 (UTC)