User talk:Sollasido90

Anita Spinelli
Hi, she looks to be notable and you have provided  some independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts, although not all the text is referenced.

The problem is that you are writing an opinion piece or fan page rather than a factual encyclopaedia article. You make many statements that are opinions rather than facts. For example "In her rich iconography she explores themes related to being. In form and in content her work reflects an urge for freedom." is presented as unqualified fact, whereas at most you can only say that a person X "considered that in her rich iconography she explores themes related to being. In form and in content her work reflects an urge for freedom. I wouldn't recommend doing that much though, because it reinforced the fan page aspect". It also looks non-neutral, since you have presented a hagiography with no suggestion that she was anything less than perfect, and no balancing negative criticism of her work. Best to stick to the facts.


 * the article was created without wikilinks (I added one) looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. Remember that a copyright is carried over in translation.

Your user name and edits indicate that you have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. Obviously you can't be her, but if you have a family or commercial relationship with her, you are required to tell us about it.

I've tidied up the formatting of your sandbox a bit. As well as fixing the text, you need to add a lot more wikilinks. You should give ISBN numbers for the books, and add "in Italian" if sources are not in English. You need to remove sources you have used as references from the further reading section. I wonder if you need such a comprehensive list of woks that mention her, particularly as most are inaccessible to readers of English language Wikipedia.

Let me know if you have any queries. I suggest that you keep the text in the sandbox until we are both happy with it Jimfbleak - talk to me?  15:29, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

I made these minor edits. ''where the figure emerges from an abstract spatiality. Spinelli’s language is considered expressionist in nature, but where a visionary spirit superposes or coexists with the tragic element'' is an opinion, but is unsourced. It needs to be removed or given a proper atribution. You used a mixture of US and British spelling, I've standardised as the latter, but feel free to change to all-US if that's your preference, just needs to be consistent. You can always get ISBNs form Amazon, but not a big deal. try moveing it to artcile space and see what happens Jimfbleak - talk to me?  08:02, 1 November 2015 (UTC)