User talk:Solomonborgawker

February 2010
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Who is a Jew?. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Your contributions must be sourced. Dawnseeker2000   00:02, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Please see message above, and the article's edit summaries. Please refrain from repeatedly inserting your edit. Also, any further discussion belongs on the article's talk page, not in the text. It's not a matter of free speech, rather of compliance with WP policies. Hertz1888 (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Welcome
Your edits have some merits. But I can almost guarantee you that someone will impose a block on your account if you don't "slow down." This is a hot article. (The Who is a Jew? article.) I hope you will continue to work on it, but some advice: do so methodically. Use sources to support all assertions. No one is prepared to accept your "authority" any more than they are willing to accept my authority or anyone else's authority. You have to use reliable sources for all assertions.

Consider checking out WP:REFB. Bus stop (talk) 04:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Who is a Jew?, you will be blocked from editing.  D u s t i SPEAK!! 04:47, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Who is a Jew?. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion  (talk)  04:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 04:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)