User talk:Solutidis

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to House of Dyhrn, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: House of Dyhrn was changed by Solutidis (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955047 on 2011-10-17T10:31:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Amalia von Dyhrn
Thank you for this interesting article. You may want to add inline references (see WP:CITE). If you do so, such newly created, extensive articles are eligible for front page nomination at T:TDYK. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 22:16, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Edouard von Dyhrn
I do not understand why it should be withdrawn: there are sources--do they perhaps not document the actual material? He is stated to be a member of the legislative assembly, and would be by that alone unquestionably notable. Please respond on my talk p., so I can do not miss it. As reviewing administrator, I do not want to delete what seems like a good article, unless there is some reason.  DGG ( talk ) 02:31, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

There are many mistakes in this article, because the sources were already at the beginning very unreliable (for example dis date of birth and so on), which led (unfortunately) to the fact, that now there are a lot of incorrect info in this article. I know it is possible to simply make the changes, but I would prefer to delete this whole article, which I created and whichhave the right to suggest to be deleted. Hope you can understand it.  Solutidis ( talk ) 12:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)