User talk:Somagetfit

January 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. If you prefer to be unblocked for the purpose of changing your username to a username which complies with our username policy, so that your contributions with this username are recorded as contributions of your new username and rather than creating a new account, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice instead. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:16, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Re:your email
Well, for starters all your contributions are preserved and not permanently deleted. You can click on the "contributions" link at the top of any page or go to the article and click the "view history" tab to see all past versions of a page. However, I must say I have trouble accepting your claim that you are an unbiased and objective party when all your edits have been related to this one person and you chose the name of their website as your username. Seems pretty clear you have some sort of interest going beyond just a casual knowledge of this person. But if you insist that you are in fact capable of editing from a neutral point of view on this subject all you need do is register a new account with a username that does not imply that you represent a business or website and you are free to continue editing. If you have any doubt as to how your edits will be viewed by others or your find yourself being reverted, it is a good idea to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:18, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Crawford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Crawford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Scott Crawford & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:35, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Scott Crawford.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Scott Crawford.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)