User talk:Somb001/sandbox

Peer Review by Arjun Oza
I think you are off to a great start for your Wikipedia article. I am going to a list a few things that I really liked and that should not be changed prior to your final draft and a few points of improvement.

First off, I think your education tab is very strong. Talking to other students, many have had trouble finding information regarding the artist's place and study of education. I just recommend that you take away the bullet point format for the education and make it a paragraph. A quick formatting issue that can be simply fixed is the biography section. I see that you have a quick biography at the beginning of the page, but nothing under the Biography tab. I am guessing this is a simple formatting issue. You have left the artworks tab empty, so I suggest that you try and find some work (even if it is doubling up on the pieces later in your article.

Your exhibition subsection is done very well. Formatted well with extensive detail. The only issues I see are with the collections and publications. There is no information/ data in the collections section and there is one publication, with no citing or information other than the article. Also, external links need to be cited correctly. I really liked the flow of the article and think that if you make a few minor changes you will have a really nice article. Also, possibly consider adding a little more information if you can find any to the biography section.

Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate it! Somb001 (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2019 (UTC)