User talk:Some1asks

Do not get confused!
The Council of Europe ITSELF says, "Do not get confused" http://www.coe.int/en/web/about-us/do-not-get-confused

University Study, Stage 1 Completed (in full)
University Study, Stage 1 Completed (in full). Special Study Stage 1 has been completed in full, with all questions not only being answered but results per criterion have been achieved with great speed. As adoption was made, moving so rapidly to stage 2 has provoked various levels of external surprise. Uncle shocked but parent is reticent. Parent confirms 87% Male sub b. As per sub c. 25% under 18, 25% 18-22, 25% 23-30 and 25% over 30.

Stage 2 has already been initiated as per study protocols.

May 2016
Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because it is believed to have been compromised. Note that edits to your user talk page might not indicate that you have regained control of your account. If your privileges to e-mail and edit your user talk page have been revoked, contact ArbCom at arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Katietalk 22:37, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The account does not appear to be compromised remotely. Mike V • Talk 03:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Authorised Permitted Access
The title says it all.. Some1asks (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * No it doesn't. You can't share accounts on Wikipedia, as has been pointed out. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Who us 'sharing' an account? Is a Bot sharing an account? Is a person doing the exact bidding of the account holder, because the account holder is not able themselves to make the entry 'sharing'? Lets take International Law and associated National Laws into account (in regard to the disabled 1 in 5 of the Global Population), is someone acting solely on another's behalf, entering material entirely on a persons behalf 'sharing'.. International Law (Treaty Obligations), and connected National Laws says NO. Some1asks (talk) 13:12, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * It should be pointed out, perhaps, that "International Law (Treaty Obligations), and connected National Laws" will not help you much if you have your talk-page access revoked. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Having had the account 'blocked' erroneously, it has not stopped access! Multiple computer devices, multiple locations, multiple internet network providers, new identities, are not going to stop anyone! ESPECIALLY when Some1asks (talk) 13:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Authorised Permitted Access is the issue, and if and when actions by Wikipedia breaches International Law it makes it vulnerable to a class action prosecution!

Well, here you are-
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
 * Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  13:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

QUOTE FROM 'May 2016' pp Some1asks (talk) 13:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * : The account does not appear to be compromised remotely. Mike V • Talk 03:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I've revoked your Talk page access. You may use WP:UTRS to appeal.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppeteer
Note that this user engaged in sockpuppeteering to get around their block using the account, which has now been blocked. --Yamla (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)