User talk:SomeGirl 678

Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;) produces your name and the current date. Again, welcome! -- bullet proof  3:16 20:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC) Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! -- bullet proof  3:16 20:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Broly
Actually, he is stronger than SSj2. Otherwise, it wouldn't have taken several Super Saiyans to defeat him. Also, adding "(stop changing it, what was there before is inaccurate)" doesn't really help keep your additions in the article. Please read the messages that have been left on your talk page. You did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? If you can't prove that a SSj2 is stronger than LSSj Broly, it will be considered original research and it will be removed. Thank you for your time. // Sasuke  -kun  27  20:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, so wait. My edit was stating that he's NOT stronger than a SSJ2, yet here you are agreeing with me. So why did you change it in the first place? It's pretty obvious that he's weaker than an SSJ2 considering every time he's defeated, it's by someone who is far weaker than a SSJ2. Even if he did borrow energy from some of his friends originally to defeat Broly, that energy couldn't possibly have come close to SSJ2 level. One SSJ2 is far stronger than several SSJ's together.


 * Sorry, I meant to say "is stronger", not the other way around. Anyway, bring it up with User:3bulletproof16 since he could probably explain it better than I can. // Sasuke  -kun  27  20:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)