User talk:Some Gadget Geek/2016/November

501 Queen
Hi there,

I noticed you replaced the tags I removed from the above article. I'm not denying this article could do with condensing - in fact I have no idea what the standard layout for such articles is. However it strikes me that a) you have quite a specific idea of what you have in mind for the article and b) the suggested improvements don't sound too onerous, so wouldn't it be easier if you made the changes yourself?!

I really hope this message doesn't sound passive-aggressive or anything, I'm just a cleanup Wall-E trying to find the best solution :) Have a good day Jdcooper (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Have a look at articles about tram routes in Melbourne. They pretty much have a consistent format for headings, namely a "History", "Route" and "Operation" section. We can use sub-headings where appropriate to provide more specific information about each route. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 00:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Agtx. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Seth Kaper-Dale, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. agt x 04:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the templated message. I unreviewed it because it did not meet A7. Probably he isn't notable, but as the article says he's running for governor of a state, that's enough to require a deletion discussion. agt x  04:05, 14 November 2016 (UTC)