User talk:Someone another/Archive 2

Over the Hedge (handheld game)
Just an idea - I dunno if you'd be into this, but one way to expand the article is to add the Game Boy Advance game into the equation. - A Link to the Past (talk) 17:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * To be honest LTTP, I went at the article as hard as I could but was halted by the lack of development details out there and the fact that I can't expand the plot section without access to the game's manual or game itself for quoting characters, integrating the GBA version would run me against the same wall. It was intended as a case study to demonstrate that individual games don't need cramming into grouped articles and can benefit from having enough space to cover them properly, which it has achieved. According to Henrik's traffic tool, It receives about 8 hits a day on average, compared to about 40 for the obscure indie RPG Geneforge. My time would be better spent building up Geneforge 2 in the same way - it proves the point that indie games can receive significant coverage and be converted into quality articles. Someoneanother 10:12, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

RE: Assessment
...Assessment? What assessment? I have a bad habit of forgetting stuff I do...so, erm, could you remind me? :P Sorry for the inconvenience. --haha169 (talk) 16:16, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, that! I forgot about it already...I've removed it. Relist after the FAC fails will be good, but hopefully, there won't be a need to relist. --haha169 (talk) 17:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed, the best of luck. Someoneanother 17:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. If you have time, feel free to leave a review. I don't want to have SandyGeorgia end up giving all the bad stuff - that's not a good sign. --haha169 (talk) 18:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Allgame
First off, thanks for the assessment of Zanac; I felt it needed a bit more, too. I am currently tied up with another article (Ninja Gaiden (NES)) right now, but I may get back to Zanac when I have time.

As far as allgame is concerned, is that a verifiable source? If it is, then shouldn't we list it under the list of already-known verifiable sources for future reference? MuZemike (talk) 18:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a commercial database aiming to provide details on all games, it shouldn't be problematic in terms of reliability. The sources list certainly does need updating, I'll look at it at some point. Whenever you'd like further input on Zanac or any other game, please give the assessment page a whirl. Someoneanother 18:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * By the way, I've changed the rating to C-class, as it is now apparently being used, and I've made some corrections that you suggested. I'll put another request up later on. MuZemike (talk) 17:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

WP: VG A-class
I want to activate a formal process for WP: VG's assessment department for rating A-classes. Similar to GAN, but it requires two volunteers to assess the article. They could be used like GAN, placed underneath requests on the assessment page:


 * [[Image:Symbol_wait.svg|15px]] On hold: This article is currently awaiting improvements before pass/fail.
 * Second opinion: This reviewer has passed this article, but requires second editor's assessment to promote this article to A-class.
 * [[Image:Searchtool-80%.png|15px]] Review — This article is currently being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).
 * Promoted This article has been promoted by User: Example and User: Example2.

An example could be like this:
 * 1) Article - currently GA class, wish for A-class. --nom's sig
 * 2) Second opinion: This reviewer has passed this article, but requires second editor's assessment to promote this article to A-class. --assessor's sig
 * 3) [[Image:Symbol_wait.svg|15px]] On hold: This article is currently awaiting improvements before pass/fail. --2assessor's sig

We can make templates out of these, similar to GAReview. --haha169 (talk) 22:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (July 2008)

 * Newsletter delivered by xenobot  03:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

RuneScape
Why there is no template on RuneScape?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:17, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Which template? Someoneanother 13:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I mean a template which will document all the characters and other relevant entries. However I see there is not separate article on the characters of RuneScape.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The sub-articles were deleted at AFD some time ago. The sources available don't go into any detail regarding the game - we can cite that it's a very important game in terms of players (it's even in the Guinness World Records gamer edition 2008), but nobody is covering the in-game aspects properly. Unfortunately nobody is stepping forward to fill the gap in coverage of MMOGs, the only sites which cover them consistently are unreliable or little more than GameFAQ reader reviews hosted on other sites. Someoneanother 13:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for SOCOM II
I wanted to thank you for helping with the SOCOM II article. I was prevented from editing on the article again, and that guy kept on adding OR. Thank you!

- Shane —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.221.143 (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

GAN
Did you know that you can transclude your GAN comments to the talk page - and make it more visible so people can see it? I did that for you in your review in Secret of Evermore, in this edit. --haha169 (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll remember to do the same once I've had a chance to look through Golden Sun. Someoneanother 19:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Secret of Evermore GAN
Hello. I'm primarily responsible for getting Secret of Evermore up to GA standards at the moment, so I've been performing the necessary alterations you've suggested on its talk page. I'd like to make a few comments.

First, I don't have any sales information on the game; the only thing I've found to this extent was an interview with Ted Woolsey, in which he stated the game was a financial flop. I didn't want to you use that, so I've simply removed that aspect from the lead.

Second, you mentioned that it needs more references in the Gameplay and Plot sections. Would you recommend using the reviews I have access to, or something else to fill the gaps?

Third, I live in the United States, but I believe the game was released in certain PAL regions in a large box with a strategy guide. See the reference I've listed at MobyGames, which has an image of the German version featuring a 76-page guide. I've also seen images of the French version with a 72-page guide on forums and eBay. Unfortunately, they wouldn't be reliable sources, so I was forced to use the reference I currently have. If needed, I'll remove the statement altogether.

Last, I was unable to obtain all the paper references I used in the Reception section. Believe me, I looked. So, I instead used summaries (again, Mobygames, see link). This is why I don't have authors or page numbers for those citations. As for rearranging it the way you suggested, I'll do my best.

Please respond on my talk page, or under this heading. Thank you. ~ Hibana 17:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for getting in touch and for what you've done so far. As far as the financial flop is concerned, if you quote and reference Woolsey's interview and attribute the comment to him then that's great - it's from the horse's mouth. For the references, if the sources already in the article cover the uncited info then by all means just cross-reference, no point in trying to find additional sources if it's already covered. The mobygames citation is just a reproduction of the box art which clearly states that there's a 70-something page guide included, if you've seen other PAL regions with these guides on ebay then consider it dealt with. If not having the magazine is preventing you from expanding on the points in the reception section then don't worry about it.


 * One other thing, the GameSpot piece (used to cite the translation and Europe releases) is user-submitted and isn't going to pass as reliable, I'd recommend removing the first small paragraph of reception altogether, except the big-box + strategy guide info from Mobygames. This could be moved to the end of development (before the music section). Someoneanother 18:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I've finally completed the checklist on the game's talk page, with only a few hours to spare. Please review the article again and let me know what you think. ~ Hibana 05:59, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've updated the article once again. You'll need to elaborate on what specific "gaps" you want filled. I've added quotes from the game wherever I thought it was necessary. I transcribed the script months ago, but unfortunately, the game isn't very involved when it comes to the plot. ~ Hibana 06:24, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Guitar Hero: On Tour GA review
I've corrected everything but collapsing the table, as I feel that's what most people are coming to the article to look at, but if this is a problem, we can figure something else out. --M ASEM 23:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (August 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  22:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review on hold
Hey, I reviewed Chocolatier (video game) and there were a few things that needed improving, so I put the nom on hold for now. Intothewoods29 (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Discography GAReviews
Thanks for reviewing both of my articles! Especially FF7, that one was going to sit in the list forever. I've addressed all of your concerns, so both of the articles are ready for another look! --PresN (talk) 21:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Uncharted
Thanks for helping me get the article to Good Article status, my first attempt with any article to do so - the points you raised will help me keep these things in mind in future. :) Synergy/Blades (Talk) 17:16, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That is good news, my pleasure. :) 17:40, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

GeoWars 2
Citing gameplay is ridiculous. What, you need citations for, say, Pac-Man or Galaga gameplay? You honestly need a citation to declare it's a multidirectional shooter?! JAF1970 (talk) 18:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Citing gameplay is standard, the same as the other sections. If the information seems glaringly obvious then chances are it'll be covered in the first review you click, drop a few footnotes in place and it's done. Someoneanother 18:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter
Sorry about the delay. AWB has been having a few issues lately. Here is the august issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 20:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Re: I Love Bees
I've finally gotten around to finding the sources needed; I'll leave you a message here when I'm done (sorry for the late actions, I've been busy at FAC.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 18:21, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * NP, thanks for the heads up. Someoneanother 18:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the fast turnaround! :) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 00:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Necrid assessment
Gave it a go fixing both things you mentioned. If there's anything in the lead or anything else that should be tidied I'll be glad to fix it. As always thanks for your time :)--Kung Fu Man (talk) 22:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter for August 2008

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  01:49, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Yume Nikki
Unfortunately there were zero results for it in the last six years on LexisNexis... Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 11:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sad to hear it, but you're a star for looking. Someoneanother 15:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

My thanks for this AfD. In a short time you showed courtesy to the article's author, respect for the effort put into it, concern for truth by doing the research that we're supposed to do when you would've gotten away with omitting it, impartiality in placing the article's merits over any possible ideologies about what Wikipedia should include, and readiness to cooperate. All in all, an example of how we must treat each other now that creating the largest reference work in human history has turned out to be the easy part. Kudos. --Kiz o r  22:32, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That's very good of you to say, I didn't like nominating it but felt it best if I did it so nobody would label it insignificant or whatever, since most of my edits are on articles like that. I'll do my best to treat everyone the same way. Someoneanother 23:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Empires (mod)
Hello there, I was wondering if you'd forgotten about the abive GAN that you've got under review? TBH I was going to quick-fail it but missed the chance, it's still a start-class article, a C at the very most. Someoneanother 18:55, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have quickfailed it LegoKontribsTalkM 23:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Someoneanother 00:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Since you asked...
(at WT:VG)... I went ahead and put it up for FAC, at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings. Giggy (talk) 00:14, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Me and my big mouth. Someoneanother 00:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I just had to laugh out loud!
Just take a look at the Frog cake section... ;) And I wanted to take the review because I also agreed that those things look so tasty! :) Go ahead and take the review if you want, and have a nice day! CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The timing is almost scary. TBH I'm really tired could do with some rest, so please do and I'll have a look-see tomorrow, plenty of other articles out there for me to review, thanks for your consideration. Someoneanother 01:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Awww, I owe ya one! Those things look too tasty... I should tell the nominator "This article is in such high demand that TWO reviewers tried reviewing it at the same time!!" :) Have a nice sleep! CarpetCrawler (talk) 01:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (September 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  12:53, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Sacrifice (2008)
Okay, I think I should inform you of this just in case. I recently have been incredibly busy. So fixes for Sacrifice might not be really quick but I assure you they will be finish within a day or two. The sources and reception stuff will be completed tomorrow. I just thought to tell you that because I don't want you to think I'm ignoring the review. I just have alot of stuff in real life that is getting alot of my attention. I only have about a few minutes at a time to get on and I usually do what takes me a second or two then get off. I hope you understand, I'm grateful for the review so I don't want you to think you are reviewing it for no reason. You can see I don't have alot of time by reading it and seeing all the probelms within it that are simple things to catch. I don't think I've read the full thing through since I nominated it. I feel you deserve to know my situation.-- Will C  08:22, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for keeping me in the loop, but it must be stressed that you have a week to do these two fairly small edits and real life always come first. Don't stress about not having the time to do it now, just do so when you get a free minute in the coming week. Talk to you then. Someoneanother 15:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I'll have them fixed here in a minute. I have sometime today. I'm home schooled and I'm trying to get done so I can go back to public school. I have to finish the year I'm in before I can go back or get enough of it done that I can go back. That is mainly why I do not have alot of time.-- Will C  17:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Okay, I changed the sources and did a little copyedit. Now I'm working on the reception. And to make sure, what is you want me to do with the Sun article? Just to be clear. To improve the article I want to make sure I'm doing what I'm supposed to be doing.-- Will C  20:21, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Replied on the GAN review page, nearly there. Someoneanother 20:54, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for listing it as a GA. Now I have two GA articles. Now after I work on it I might, if I have enough time, take it to FA. But that is probably in unforeseeable future. Thanks.-- Will C  19:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, remember me? I've taken your idea about The Sun into account and decided to do the same for a few other articles. Right now I'm having trouble in finding a review like the one from Sacrifice for the article Lockdown (2008). Now I'm never on The Sun's website, so I do not really know how to get around. If you would be so kind and to look and see if they have a review like the one from Sacrifice up for Lockdown I would really appreciate it?-- Will C  15:41, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

(Remove indent) Hey, of course I remember you :) There's an article on Lockdown here, all you need to do is use google, type the name of the event, leave "The Sun" in speech marks like that and include the name of the promoter, TNA, and out it pops as the first result. It would be good to see some extra critique of the events but don't get distracted from the Wrestling Project's priorities in terms of seats and sales information. Reviewing Sacrifice was a good experience, hoping to do some more in the future. Someoneanother 15:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks. This will help get Lockdown to FA. I'll remember that. I try to help the reviewer, I do what I'm told even if I might not agree with. Well I hope to work with you again in the future. Maybe you and me can become wikifriends or whatever you call it. You and me probably will work together again since I'm the only TNA expander. I have 40 some ppvs to expand and all are going to GA. I'll have two in this next month up at GAN. Well thanks for the review. This has helped.-- Will C  16:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My pleasure, doubtless we'll work on another TNA GAN, take care of yourself. Someoneanother 16:54, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey, you never know maybe one day a TNA FAC.-- Will C  17:24, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

GA Review
Thanks for deciding to review Soul Reaver! The Clawed One (talk)
 * My pleasure, we were doing pretty well in terms of keeping our GA candidates up to date but that's slipped back recently. Someoneanother 13:56, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, read the review and fixed the issues you noted to the best of my abilities. However, I'm stumped on the last section, where you give the following:


 * 1) What makes Totalvideogames and Planet Dreamcast reliable?
 * 2) Ref #28 is a press release, please cite it as one.

I have no experience with checking the verifiability of sources, so I don't know if they're reliable. As for Ref 28, how do I cite a press release? The Clawed One (talk)


 * Oh, I'm also not sure how to fill out the templates for images. The Clawed One (talk)

I've removed the PlanetDreamcast source and incorporated the AllGame one hastily but suitably. As you review the other sources, I will draw one thing to mind, as I was warned one source might be challenged.

The site is "Gaming Intelligence Agency" is sourced twice, and seems to be an archive of an old site rather than an active one. However, I am confident their information is valid - an IGN article sources them as a source for an article on Soul Reaver, and GIA themselves source in a site called "videogames.com", which we now know as Gamespot. Based on one established reliable site sourcing them, and another being sourced by them, I am confident in considering GIA reliable for the two sourcings it is used for. The Clawed One (talk)

Thank you very much, good sir. Seven months of work finally pays off. Thanks once again for reviewing and for passing the article. The Clawed One (talk)
 * You're welcome and thank you, another Good Article for everyone to enjoy. Someoneanother 02:28, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (October 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  16:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Props
Just writing here that I'm glad to see you're still contributing to our little corner of Wikipedia in an amazing manner, a little less than a year after I told you this in the form of a barnstar. I'm not one to overdo that kind of thing, so this message will have to do. User:Krator (t c) 23:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's appreciated, so long as I can contribute a net positive in fits and starts it's time well spent. :) Someoneanother 08:31, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Empire: Total War rating
I have to disagree with you on re-rating the article as C-class. Very few unreleased games are able to create a respectable reception section, mostly only when there has been a turbulent development process for a high-profile game. At the moment, Empire: Total War has no reception information available, so the information is as comprehensive and complete as verifiable sources allow. A lack of information in a certain area where it can't be verified shouldn't be held against an article (I know its vapourware, but StarCraft: Ghost reached FA and it doesn't really have any major reception data in it beyond the mention of one listing on Wired). As such, I think it should probably be B-class until it is released, when extra sources that highlight an obvious gap in comprehensiveness will appear. I'm not going to change it back myself though, I'll leave that in your hands as to whether you wish to take my argument into account or not. -- Sabre (talk) 21:08, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The reason for the reception info not being there will resolve itself before or during the game's release, it isn't included in the article because it isn't out there to take, but that will change with time. With Ghost the assumption is reversed, it is unlikely to be released, so it is treated as a finished product. The intention wasn't to do the article down, it's a GA candidate in the making, just to reflect that it has reached the highest rating it can until the next major event in its history has passed. Rating it B before the fact means that the rating devalues the moment significant reception information arrives. IMO it's better to move up to that level when the information is there and having the rating stick for good, rather than having a moving target to chase after because a predicted event has taken place. Someoneanother 08:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Very well, that makes sense. Thanks. -- Sabre (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Re:GA review
I've responded to your comments. I'm having problems trying to get the wording right on a couple of points, if its not to your liking, could you see if you could get it to how you mean? Thanks for the review. -- Sabre (talk) 15:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Iji
I moved the article on "Iji" to your userspace, because... well, frankly, you didn't say anything about the game to indicate how it's notable compared to any other of the thousands of freeware games made with Game Maker, so I would have been within my rights to delete it. Here's your chance to actually show why the article should exist. DS (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I say! :0 I'll have a look for additional sources and work on some reception, which will hopefully do the job. Someoneanother 14:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (November 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  20:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Godzilla
Hi. Just wanted to congratulate you for the good work on Godzilla Generations. I couldn't comment on the AFD because it has just been closed. Cheers, --Cattus talk 20:41, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That's good of you to say, thank you :) Someoneanother 21:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Requesting a second opinion
Since you were the guy who reviewed Hit the Road at GAN and assessed Freelance Police, I figured you'd probably be the right person to seek a second opinion on this. Could you give User:S@bre/Sam & Max a brief go-over for me? Its not done yet, there's still a few holes in referencing for the existing prose, but I just want to make sure that someone else thinks its coming together reasonably well. Any feedback you could give on it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Sabre (talk) 23:46, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Gladly, I'll take a good look over the weekend. Someoneanother 19:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I've dealt with those issues. I've almost finished it now, with luck should be done by either later today or tomorrow. -- Sabre (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Prinny notes
Hey, I started adding a few of these to the article citing the World of Disgaea book but figured you'd be able to handle the distribution of the information into the article better than I atm. Either way, here's all the notes related to the little guys I gleamed from the book:

p. 77 Etna has a prinnie pouch

p. 84 Stands for "Penguin Minions" They have a vast arsenal hidden in their bags (4th dimmension space) Can grasp anything with hidden suction cups on their flippers Explode when they hit something too hard Many seem to be masochists Approx 100cm tall, though height varies Facial expressions do not change much Ties around chest area varies as a means to tell each of them apart Their skin feels like a regular costume Starts perspiring when their emotions change

p. 100 Unknown why they explode in the first place.

p. 155 Regular and Big Sis plushies Hats and prinnie pouch merchandise

Hope it helps some.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sure it will, thanks for taking the time. I might not be able to deal with this promptly as my time and enthusiasm are running very low ATM, but I will be monitoring sources running up to the release of Prinny. Someoneanother 18:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Re
Well, I saw that it said "OneChanbara: Bikini Samurai Squad" for the Wii release, so I assumed that they were the same games. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 03:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Why
Why are you retiring? If I may ask?-- Will C  06:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
 * As well as the usual niggles which I won't bore you with, I've found that the time I spend actually contributing is dwarfed by the time spent hunting for sources which I end up never using, and looking over hollow discussions about discussions. It isn't a productive use of my time, it isn't a fun use of my time, I've got a stack of video games I haven't played which is growing and a head full of ideas for games of my own. If I spent as much time learning to use Game Maker or Flash as I do dithering about here then I'd be pushing out games worth playing instead of writing about the work of others. All that said I may fall off the wagon as I did before and return, but hopefully I'll be too busy. It was nice working with you, take care and have a great Christmas. Someoneanother 13:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas man
And it sucks to see you go :(--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And yourself, hope you've enjoyed it. Don't be sad about me retiring, it's doing wonders for my sanity :D Take care. Someoneanother 10:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

You've been conspicuous in your absence. My worst worries are true, and you've decided to leave. But don't look back :) There is much more to life than Wikipedia. Good luck! Randomran (talk) 03:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) Take care of yourself. Someoneanother 15:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Well crap. I must say that it always sucks when a good editor decides to leave, but I can certainly understand why. And as Randomdan points out, real life trumps Wiki-life. Take care and good luck in whatever you do. (Guyinblack25 talk 16:25, 28 January 2009 (UTC))
 * Nice of you to say but it's not as though I was doing much anyway :) I will probably make gnome edits here and there, which aren't time consuming, but I'm going to keep as far as possible from anything too involving. Someoneanother 19:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (December 2008)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  22:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Horror needs your help
 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir <span style="font-family:CarbonType,American Typewriter,Bookman Old Style,Courier;">(talk) 00:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Re:Something I've kept meaning to do for awhile now
Thanks, I appreciate it muchly! (is "muchly" a word?) -- Sabre (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The WPVG Newsletter (January 2009)

 * Newsletter delivery by xenobot  00:21, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Hi!
Gosh, I hope you aren't really retired. I just got your note re. "Runes of Magic" and I unprotected the title. Have fun! --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I am retired, but I've got some free time ATM so I'm trying to tie up some loose ends at the video game project, and in this case there's a DRV waiting to happen due to the unusual amount of attention the game is getting already, far easier for me to knock something servicable together now and stop more red tape. Thanks for unlocking it :) Someoneanother 13:01, 4 February 2009 (UTC)