User talk:Someonenewnow

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Someonenewnow! Thank you for your contributions. I am Archer1234 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Archer1234 (talk) 15:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

October 2019
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Tessa Thompson. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Archer1234 (talk) 16:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Tessa Thompson

 * I am Archer1234. It can be upsetting when an edit you've made gets reverted.  You spent time to share knowledge and it can feel like a personal rejection or a slap in the face of all the hard work you have done.  That is not the case here.  I trust that you come to make these edits "in good faith".

However, as you are new to Wikipedia you may not be aware of the principles and policies under which it operates. One of the key principles is that information that is added must be verified by citing "WP:reliable sources". In addition, not all information about a person, place, thing, etc. is appropriate for an encyclopedia. It is common for articles for celebrities to get full of lots of trivial information that is not necessary and appropriate to include. Wikipedia is "not a tabloid".

In addition, when an edit you make is reverted, it is your responsibility to start a discussion on the article's talk page to try to resolve the dispute and seek consensus. This is explained in the "BOLD, revert, discuss cycle" article. If you decline to engage and communicate with the other editor(s) and continuing reinserting text you think should be in there, you could face sanctions including being blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of time.

If you want to seek consensus from other editors to include your text in "Tessa Thompson" go to "Talk:Tessa Thompson" and start a new section and make your case.

If you want to reply to this message, please do so here on your talk page in this section. Be sure to "WP:INDENT" your response (see the "Talk page guidelines"). – Archer1234 (talk) 16:51, 15 October 2019 (UTC)


 * I have started a discussion on whether information about Thompson's 2019 Comic Con Midwest appearance should be included in the article. I invite you to participate in the discussion to seek consensus with other editors (see WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and WP:Communication is required). I look forward to your participation on the talk page. – Archer1234 (talk) 15:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi! I'm Nici. Just chiming to say I agree with Archer1234 here: this information is in no way encyclopedic and should not be included in the article. Actors receive marriage proposals constantly from fans - I've been at 2 cons and saw fans propose to actors at both. That doesn't mean it should be included on wikipedia.
 * There comes a point where your edits are disruptive and will no longer be tolerated by the editing community, particularly since you have thus far failed to engage with any other editor. Edit warring is not tolerated on wikipedia, and you may find yourself on the wrong end of a block. NiciVampireHeart 15:39, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Tessa Thompson. ''You continue to add content that is being challenged by fellow editors. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to work with your fellow editors to resolve disputes. You have been invited to discuss this on the talk page, but, so far, have not done so. Instead you just continue to add back what you think the article should say. This is disruptive and edit warring. If you continue in this behavior, it will be brought to the attention of administrators for possible sanctions. I encourage you to avoid that by engaging, in good faith, with your fellow editors.'' Archer1234 (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)