User talk:Something messy

July 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gina Rinehart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gina Rinehart was changed by Something messy (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936347 on 2017-07-03T10:21:57+00:00.

Please stop removing referenced material and re-writing the article against Wikipedia's manual of style. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Favonian (talk) 17:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 22:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

I have been blocked from Wikimedia. I was editing profile that was a total misrepresentation and bias and incorrect. I want the whole profile of Gina Rinehart to be removed. If you do not allow edit to take place please remove entire profile immediately. As it is incorrect what kind of volunteers do you have who do not write accurately it is a total disgrace to allow such misrepresentation to be published. The article is a disgrace to wikipaedia which is supposed to present factual information, but is inaccurate and biased where Mrs Rinehart is concerned and should be withdrawn in entirety or written again. I would like to be unblocked. Something messy (talk) 09:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

My block from editing was incorrect. I did not violate any policy. The block should be reversed to have correct wording. I am acting in good faith to ensure accuracy.

Let have accurate profiles.

Thank you for taking this into consideration.

I would like the opportunity to fix this acting in good faith.

Something messy (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)