User talk:Sometung

The article James Brown (scout) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:45, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Deleted again -- you need to provide reliable independent sources that recognize this 17-year-old as notable per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Notability of James Brown (scout)
A tag has been placed on James Brown (scout) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin13 (talk) 11:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of James Brown(scout)
A tag has been placed on James Brown(scout) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 12:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. And we've told you, several times now, that you need to supply reliable independent sources to show that this person is notable. If you can't, stop reposting the article. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh i can post reputable independent source and im trying to figure out how to include a book as seen in my past article with reference 1 an 2 but it said something was wrong so im not sure


 * The alleged book you cited, "Young Abseilers of the 21st Century", has zero Google hits. The other source was a Facebook page.  Please read WP:V for a description of what counts as a reliable source.  Also, people might take you a little more seriously if you didn't include stuff like "he is rumored to have been born in the depths of a cave".  NawlinWiki (talk) 12:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC) But he is, his parents are extremely keen caveers and were rumoured to be exploring the depths of week jasper at which stage James popped out early and therefore born in the cave and people dont have a chance to take me seriously if all ur doing is deleting articles, not even talking to me on ur user page. Just because a book isnt on google doesnt mean it isnt around, many a good abseiling book can not be found on google, many a good book can not be found on google let alone obscure intellectual books like young abseilers of the 21st century


 * Nice try. But Wikipedia doesn't work on rumors and on what you, or I, say is true.  If your information can't be verified (and it sounds like you're saying it can't be, except by taking your word for it), then we can't use it.  NawlinWiki (talk) 12:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Well ill give you that one but i do say you should look at your user discussion page WAY more often

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel Musters
A tag has been placed on Nathaniel Musters requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 11:29, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I've read the note you left within the body of the above-captioned article. Since this individual doesn't come close to meeting the requirements of WP:ATHLETE, I've decided to agree with the individual who tagged the article for speedy deletion.  You might want to look at WP:Why was my article deleted? for background information about deletions and at WP:Your first article for some hints about how to create pages within Wikipedia's guidelines.  Best of luck with your future endeavours. Accounting4Taste: talk 17:31, 13 June 2009 (UTC)