User talk:Somsiblabla

February 2016
Hello, I'm Emotionalllama. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Pit bull without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emotionalllama (talk) 16:34, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Your recent edit to Ashbourne, County Meath appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(ring-ring)  17:56, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Houston Astros. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:51, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding improperly sourced content, as you did to Last Man Standing (U.S. TV series). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)


 * All content added to Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources. The source that you used does not constitute a relaible source. It is obviously a fan page created with a specific agenda and is not suitable as a source or even an external link per WP:FANSITE. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 20:11, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Battle of Jericho, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:33, 18 June 2017 (UTC) No, I gave a source.
 * You gave a newspaper source. The media is not a good source at all for archaeology, and it was disappointing to see how unfamiliar the author was with the material. You deleted a large number of academic sources simply because you thought they were biassed, giving preference to a newspaper source endorsing the view of a religiously driven archaeologist. And you left the article making a claim about research that was simply false. Doug Weller  talk 12:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Doug, nothing either of us says will change one another's minds. I will respect it though. I just believe that the extra information provided was irrelevant to the topic of the page and therefore did not belong there. Thank you for taking the time to respond to me respectfully and cordially! I hope you have a great day sir! Lucasashby (talk) 23:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


 * And thank you. I hope you also have a good day. Doug Weller  talk 14:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:26, 20 June 2017 (UTC)