User talk:Sona11235

General relativity
Thanks for trying to help, but your edit broke a template and capitalized what we don't capitalize on wikipedia. This article is a featured article, meaning many people spent many hours on it. Please discuss radical changes at its talk page first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Basically, nothing is capitalized in wikipedia articles, with exceptions listed in Capitalization. At some point of wikipedia existence, it became absolutely necessary to set and follow certain conventions, or vanish in edit wars. Materialscientist (talk) 09:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I did not mean to be unfriendly. Sure, there are plenty of mistakes around. What I wanted to say is that general approach to featured articles is to boldly fix only obvious errors and post a message at the talk page if the changes are not trivial. WP:PHYS would be even a better forum in this case. I don't know the answer to your question, but assume there might be a reason why it says 1915 in the opening. Maybe "History section" will explain. If not, post and see. Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

According to our articles, History of general relativity and Relativity priority dispute, both Einstein and Hilbert arrived at the correct version of the theory in 1915. And Einstein had a publication on it in 1915: "Einstein, A. (1915) "Zur allgemeinen Relativatstheorie", Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 831-839" which was prior to his publication in "Einstein, A. (1916) "Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie", Annalen der Physik, 49". I do not have the ability to personally verify whether these articles are correct in so saying or not. JRSpriggs (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)