User talk:Sonalisha

C
If you have information about C programming what is preventing you adding it to the main article? Please reply. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of LITIndia
Hello Sonalisha,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged LITIndia for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jonathanarpith (talk) 09:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Please tell me how i will post an article on wiki with success.

Proposed deletion of Susantk.rout


The article Susantk.rout has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 12:14, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susantk.rout


The article Susantk.rout has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Some advice
Hello Sonalisha and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm sorry to see that your articles have been deleted. Looking at some of what you've done, though, makes me think you may be better to stop editing for a bit until you've found out more about how we work. You need to understand why articles about people need references, and how to make references, and why statements like "this is good to know" just don't belong in Wikipedia articles.

Why not start with our introductory page and follow some of the links from there, then read a few articles about anything that interests you to see how an article is put together, how references work, and the style of writing that is usual here. Good luck Noyster  (talk),  18:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 16/32 bit C Programming


A tag has been placed on 16/32 bit C Programming requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://susantk.wordpress.com/1632-bits-programming-concept/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JHCaufield - talk - 14:06, 3 December 2014 (UTC) A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Why use barcode labels, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages; user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy deletion candidate). Doing so will take you to your user talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also edit this page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would help make it encyclopedic. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Frosty ☃ 05:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Earl of Devon has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Earl of Devon was changed by Sonalisha (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851517 on 2014-12-01T11:44:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Sonalisha, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Thank you. Widr (talk) 06:05, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwertyus. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Susantk.rout, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at 32/16 bit C programming. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   18:57, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 79th Street (Manhattan). —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   19:18, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm War wizard90. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Crazy Taxi because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -War wizard90 (talk) 07:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Acroterion   (talk)   21:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. —S MALL JIM   21:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)