User talk:Songhope

LEC
I undid your edit to Living Enrichment Center because it may have introduced more problems than it resolved.
 * All facts must have reliable sources available which are verifiable.
 * First-hand knowledge is not a reason to alter content unless it can be backed up with a verifiable source.
 * Due to the complexity of LEC's demise, so-called "[i]naccurate, personal commentary" should probably remain if it has a cited reliable source.
 * Likewise with "Generalizations (inaccurate)".

As I mentioned in my edit summary, it would be better to remove only unsupported facts from the article in one edit, and subsequent edits to address other types of problems. This helps with reverting not throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Please attempt to improve the article, but beware this is a contentious topic. Note that the article's talk page has two archives of discussion. Thanks, —EncMstr (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)