User talk:Sonic2030

Sonic2030 Welcome!

Hello, Sonic2030, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Wesley Snipes have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User talk:Unfriend12 22:56, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Stay off my talk page.
Stay off my talk page. You have not shown that you understand the basic wp:pillars of Wikipedia. Again, see wp:BLP. Consider joining the discussion at wp:BLPN for the Wesley Snipes article.User talk:Unfriend12 22:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Sonic2030, you are invited to the Teahouse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sonic2030

As stated above, I have requested that a checkuser (Elockid) investigate the IPs involved. Equally as stated above, yes, an anonymous editor making the exact same edits twenty minutes after a warning has been issued is sufficient grounds for a block. You are not helping your case by filing further unblock requests and shouting; if anything, you are making it increasingly likely that your block will be extended to indefinite. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:37, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Per this message from DeltaQuad, checkuser shows that the relationship between this account and the Canadian IP mentioned above is . Based on a UTRS request from Sonic2030, I am reinstating talkpage access to allow another unblock request here in light of this information. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Are you aware of any relationship between yourself and HelferLad? To avoid any suggestion of subterfuge, I ask because you, that user and the IP already mentioned have all made exactly the same edits to the Salvation army article.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 15:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Who? Only postings I have done in the last several days has been here. I did file a appeal by the appeal system that someone above had a link to. So no I am me and me only. So anybody editing something I did I am guilty of their sins as well? I don't mean it rudly, but really how can I defend myself against something I can't defend other than... no? If I went to the library and posted as a IP and did the same edit as you would you be happy being banned and told "I don't believe you"? I called out a editor who was removing large parts of the Salvations page without talk and parts that have a dozen+ Cit's and he gets the Mods to ban me so he can keep editing when I called him out for doing worse. So again no I am not Heferlad, Canada IP, or anyone else. --Sonic2030 (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Were you to do that, it would arouse suspicion, but probably wouldn't lead to Anthony being blocked right away. The difference in your case is that you were already blocked when you/the IP/the Tooth Fairy made the same edits. As almost anyone familiar with the Internet is aware, IP addresses prove nothing. That's why we have Checkuser. But even with an inconclusive result, our policies allow us to block based on similar behavior alone, subject to the sort of review this is getting. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The "Tooth Fairy"? No I am not the Tooth Fairy, helferlad, canada ip, etc... This is the only account I have edited as. So no I did not edit when I was blocked other than this page. /rollseyes --Sonic2030 (talk) 19:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * "/rollseyes"? Nice to see you're taking this opportunity to become unblocked so seriously (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:09, 20 December 2012 (UTC)