User talk:SonicAD

Archive 1 - Mar. 15 2004-May 27 2006

Admin Coaching
User:Tawker and I have been assigned to be your Esperanza admin coaches. You seem like you have made a lot of good contributions and done some vandal-fighting. Let me know if you have any questions about Wikipedia or its administrative areas. Academic Challenger 21:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject NASCAR proposed standards
WikiProject NASCAR needs your help! We are in the process of forming our proposed standards which, when complete, will hopefully become a Wikipedia guideline. The guidelines will help editors understand Wikipedia consensus about things like which NASCAR-related articles meet notability standards. Please stop by and let us know what you think! Recury 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!
Many happy returns! Enjoy :-)!

Thistheman 04:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday and all the best! Have a nice time. --Bhadani 14:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Have a very happy birthday.--Dakota ~ 16:33, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Notes to you
I noticed your discussion on Nascar, I'm not quite sure what you speak of related to spam on the site I suggested but I did just that suggest it. I have no affiliation to that site, I merely suggested what I feel to be a high quality site where NASCAR fans and enthusiasts can participate in diuscussion and ask questions about NASCAR as where they can not do so here on Wikipedia. I feel it's a valuable addition to the wiki, and the people browsing for info would find it of quality and usefulness. It's simply a forum. I'd reccomend that you do not let any of your own personal ill feelings or miss judgments sway you from allowing a valuable resource that wiki surfers might really enjoy visiting, it's about them not you or I or our opinions. I just thought it was a nice site. Please work with me here. Thanks! --Edited By a Professor of Life 14:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC).

Note from Edward Neal. You have accused me of writing nonsense on the 9/11 post. I did not write those things on there. I would like you to do further research before you accuse people of such things. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.212.155.7 (talk) 12:50, 13 October 2006.
 * I'm very sorry about this... I use a program called VandalProof to deal with vandalism, and the warning seems to have gone to you in error... I can see you didn't do it, so I've deleted your warning. Again, very sorry about this. -- SonicAD (talk) 17:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

HEY can you READ? links on nitrous were ok'd. You need to READ and talk to people before you go removing editd --Edited By a Professor of Life 00:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

SONIC THIS IS THE LAST TIME STOP VANADLZIING PAGES, STOP REMOVING LINKS THAT YOU HAVE BEEN INFORMED THAT WERE APPROVED BY AN ADMIN Cuchullain aproved the addition of the links under external links it is cited on his talk page. STOP avandlizing the page, you are well aware they are approved links. Instead of talking about it or contacting Cuchullain you continue to vandalize. --Edited By a Professor of Life 00:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

If you continue you attack me personally, lie and spam you will be blocked, your abuse of this system will not be tolerated. High admins have been notified.--Edited By a Professor of Life 01:06, 14 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Think he's back (with a username).. curious choice and way of editing. ..Hu12 21:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Can't tell, yet... possible, but I did a whois on the site added and I couldn't find a connection to the other vandal... just someone else who wants to put their spam crap on Wikipedia, probably. -- SonicAD (talk) 22:32, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * agreed, seems to be a Private Registration created 26-Sep-2006.. either way It smells of pre holiday SEO. have a good weekend Hu12 10:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, SonicAD! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 18:08, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you will be blocked for vandalism. MrWez 10:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please note the above warning was given by a user after I reverted his talk page when he blanked it. -- SonicAD (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the warning. --MrWez 20:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Bahaha
I found this and thought it was hilarious, so here, have a cookie. ~ thesublime514 • talk  • sign  03:52, April 10, 2007 (UTC) ... you wrote it, right?

Ice Hockey Project discussion of hockey player notability and project scope
Please come join the WikiProject Ice Hockey Notability standards for hockey players discussion. I'd like to see input from all our project members who have an opinion. Thanks! ColtsScore 03:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

2007 All-Star Challenge
As per the drivers involved, I listed them all under their most recent NASCAR accomplishment (winning a race, former series champion, former All-Star race winner) and noted that they had also won a race in 2006 or 2007 with a plus (+) sign. Fair enough for you? NoseNuggets 9:24 PM US EDT May 6 2007.

Happy Birthday
 ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
 * FROM YOUR FRIEND:

Happy First Edit Day
-- Nadir D Steinmetz 01:34, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day
Okay, same template. So sue me. Say, your first edit day is the same as my birthday!  Two One Six Five Five  τʃ 03:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Special:Categories
Thought you might be interested that this special page was overhauled today. (CTO) Brion Vibber has promised to add a search box. I've restored the link from the category listings. We considered you suggestion, but Brion pointed out that the special page has useful information that cannot be found anywhere else -- it lists the number of articles in each category and also lists red-linked categories. -- &#x2611; SamuelWantman 09:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Time's champion
Here you go:

User:SonicAD/Time's Champion-Wafulz (talk) 16:20, 29 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Hey, Sonic. I just came across this userified article while checking to see if anyone had managed to create a page for Time's Champion.  There was a lot of info there that I hadn't been previously aware of: what was your source?  I see that Time's Champion has now been reviewed at Dreamwatch — if there are any other reviews by reliable sources, perhaps we could try to establish notability and resurrect the page.  Has it been mentioned in Doctor Who Magazine? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:33, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I had it userfied after it got AfD'd, because at that time there were no sources... the article had primarily been written by Chris McKeon himself. I'd only done so with the intent of copying it over to the TARDIS Index File, since there wasn't enough sourceable info to go on an article here. And I don't think there will be for a little while, DWM hasn't covered it yet... McKeon has been on the DWO podcast, and has his blog with info on the book, but other than that and the Dreamwatch review (that I'd not yet seen), there's not much there to establish notability. I'd wait at least until Bouncelot gets up a discontinuity guide on his site, and a couple more published reviews show up to even try. The first print run was only ~400, and while there's been a reprint, it sounds like the max it could be is 3-400. Despite it being Hinton's last novel, I think there'll be trouble meeting notability standards. -- SonicAD (talk) 02:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds reasonable. If the info in the userified version came from McKeon himself (and hasn't been repeated anywhere reliable), we'd probably have to strip the article to what's verifiable anyway.  But if DWM does cover it, I think that might make it pass the notability bar (although the requirement that the book be "available at a dozen or more libraries" might be a problem). —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:Twilight
Actually, I was just putting the link there for a shortcut, but it will technically be a task force of WP:NOVELS when completed, so we should be good there. But I think I will leave a note on the page in case someone goes looking for the project and ends up there. Thanks anyways. ~ Bella   Swan ? 02:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Project Twilight
Sure, saw it on my watchlist. I don't even remember making that edit ~ ς ح   д r   خ є  ~ 04:37, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Amazing Race 6
Hello SonicAD, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on August 14 2004, The Amazing Race 6, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Zoomzoom99 (page has mainspace links, and more than 49 edits). This has been done because the page is either pure vandalism or a blatant hoax (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add " " to the page text, and edit the to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Zoomzoom99. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 11:19, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

RfC: New helper policy
Hello member of ! You are invited to join an ongoing discussion on Wikipedia talk:IRC/wikipedia-en-help aimed at defining a policy for prerequisites to being a helper in the "" channel in a section titled "New helper policy".

To prevent future mailings about IRC, you may remove your user page from. Assistance is available upon request if you can't figure out where it is being added to your user page. This message has been sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:59, 27 April 2015 (UTC) on behalf of —

Wikipedia:Destiny listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Destiny. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Destiny redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 07:08, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)