User talk:SonicJTT

September 2014
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of Victorious episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of See Dad Run episodes. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 17:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at List of See Dad Run episodes, you may be blocked from editing. If you think you know better than the existing reference, say where you got your info otherwise assume making stuff up since you refuse to do so Geraldo Perez (talk) 00:03, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Editing Wiki
Per your edit history note where you stated "@GeraldoPerez you have no rights to edit my corrections". Everyone has the "right" to edit Wikipedia articles as long as the edits follow wiki guidelines and policy. You do not have the right to add incorrect info and I not only have the "right", but the the obligation as well, to remove that incorrect info.. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Your recent editing history at List of Jessie episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You've breached WP:3RR. The only reason I haven't blocked you is because you did not revert after you were warned and because you're a relatively new account. That said, you need to comment at the report so I can see that you understand how you violated policy. Otherwise, you may still be blocked because of the potential for repeating your misbehavior. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Continuing to edit war at the article, as you have done with this edit, is unproductive and only increases the likelihood of you being blocked, especially as your assertion that "It's not supposed to say 'First Aired' 'Last Aired'" is incorrect. WP:TVOVERVIEW specifically says "Since many series do not have proper "Premieres" and "Finales", such language should be avoided in the overview, with "First aired" and "Last aired" used instead." Please stop changing this. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 12:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of Jessie episodes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of Every Witch Way episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Info about the future of a TV series requires references Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:09, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at List of Austin & Ally episodes, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:00, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Hello, I'm Dcbanners. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of Every Witch Way episodes, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Every Witch Way, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dcbanners (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Every Witch Way episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dcbanners (talk) 15:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ni Tú Ni Yo (Jennifer Lopez song).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ni Tú Ni Yo (Jennifer Lopez song).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ni Tú Ni Yo (Jennifer Lopez song).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ni Tú Ni Yo (Jennifer Lopez song).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 07:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)