User talk:Sonichypr4

Attack pages
Please don't create attack pages, as you did at The skys reminder. You may wish to also review Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musically related topics. Continuing to create attack pages is considered vandalism and may lead to your account being blocked from editing. MastCell Talk 17:30, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

April 2008
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. -MBK004 16:12, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Diabetes mellitus
I am unsure why you have now twice inserted a poor-quality image of a chap with a bow tie in diabetes mellitus. If this person does indeed have diabetes, he is still not illustrative because - as you noted - you cannot see anything about him. From your deleted page The skys reminder I get the impression that you are not acting in good faith by inserting this image on Wikipedia. I have therefore deleted the image.

Please bear in mind that Wikipedia is closely monitored by people who want it to be a good and useful resource, not a playground. You are at liberty to make useful contributions. If, however, you continue to mess about you risk having your account permanently suspended. Let me know if you have any questions. JFW | T@lk  15:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Dannya.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dannya.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 21:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Morgan-freeman-god.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Morgan-freeman-god.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

March 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. EqualRights (talk) 12:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. This appears to be a vandalism only account and further vandalism should probably incurr an indefinite block dougweller (talk) 12:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC) You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. (MANACASAREZ (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC))

You have been from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Camw (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2009 (UTC)