User talk:Sonomezitaliano81

Image tagging for Image:Exterior Law School.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Exterior Law School.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Richmondlake.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Richmondlake.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Richmond-virginia.jpg


The file File:Richmond-virginia.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Richmond law3.JPG


The file File:Richmond law3.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Richmond law3.JPG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Richmond law3.JPG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Don't forget to claim your credit! File:Richmond law3.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Richmond law3.JPG.

It's nice to share media, It's even better when re-users can give you an appropriate credit line for your efforts. It would therefore be appreciated if you could review the information block which has been added to an upload you made, making it more complete, and that the "Source" and "Author" headers in that block accurately reflect your preferred attribution.

It would also be appreciated if you were able to add an add an extended description at the "description" header in the information block, which expands upon the information you already gave, and which provides re-users of the image with additional context. Generally a short paragraph is more than enough,ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:21, 14 July 2018 (UTC)