User talk:Sonsoftheowl

Speedy deletion of M.G.S. Fives
A tag has been placed on M.G.S. Fives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

M.G.S. Fives
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article M.G.S. Fives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of M.G.S. Fives. Gillyweed (talk) 10:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of M.G.S. Fives
I have nominated M.G.S. Fives, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/M.G.S. Fives. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gillyweed (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Mgs fives
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Mgs fives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Mgs fives. Gillyweed (talk) 21:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your request for deleted article
No, I'm not giving you a copy of your vandalism. If the "MGS school archivists" (whatever they are) want a copy of it they can email me and tell me that themselves. Sarah 11:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Hehe. Okay, but I'm still not giving you a copy of your vandalism. If the "school, archivists" want a copy of it and are not capable of using email (hey!70-year-olds do use email you know! I know some who do!) they can call the school and ask them to email me. I'm sure the school would be delighted to help the school's archivists. Easy! Sarah 12:58, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

In the meanwhile I've blocked this account as a vandalism only account. You've confessed to repeatedly posting a hoax article and then wasting other people's time on AfD while you and your school playmates pretend that it wasn't a hoax. It's clear from your contributions that you're a time-waster who isn't here to contribute constructively. I'm also going to block your other account, User:Oxlejo. Sarah 14:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)