User talk:Sonya1985

August 2009
You have been in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * So if you admit that the sole purpose of registering an account was to harass another user, why on earth would anyone unblock you? Wikipedia is not censored. --Smashvilletalk 16:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * there was no intention to harass - that is your word - not mine - i came here to to bring to an admins attention the fact that kids wanting to find out more on disneys webhamster end up in a seedy hole full of disgusting language, foul images and vile weblinks. Since this is what you want then i am clearly wasting my time and i have taken the complaint elsewhere.Sonya1985 (talk) 17:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Type "pedophile webhamster" into google and the snippet in the top result says "About 2 weeks ago i reported at least 30 pedophile images being used by ... (for example look at the editor known as 'webhamster' and the ..." So i learn that this has been a problem with him a long time before i came here - anyway i followed googles link and reported the illegal content on the hamsters site. Thanks all for the speedy response and the e-mails of encouragement.Sonya1985 (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC) BTW thanks for cleaning up some of his page (although the links are still there) in particular thank you for removing his offensive comment:- '''Oh the poor little children, how forever scarred they will be by seeing four-letter words. Fuck e'm I say. It won't be long before they're using them themselves. As for "reputation"? Do you think I give a shit what people who I'll never know think of me. Your ego may be that shallow, mine isn't. -- Web H amster  16:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)


 * "Harass"? I don't see any obvious intention to harass, here. What ever happened to gently educating people about site policy? What was so urgent about this case that needed an instant block without any apparent warnings or discussion? Concerned parents should be talked to, not blasted in the face with a shotgun first thing. – Luna Santin  (talk) 20:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Inquired with the blocking admin at User talk:Nev1 -- their reply looks to be relevant, here. Normally this would be the point where I start checkusering around a bit more, but I don't have time at the moment. I will try to check back, but for now I'll leave this to other capable hands. – Luna Santin  (talk) 20:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Following up
Now that I'm back from my weekend trip, I've had some time to take a closer look at this account's behavior. The same user also created the following accounts: Edits from one of the accounts above, and anon edits, make it clear to me that this user was socking abusively, and that their intent was malicious. – Luna Santin  (talk) 21:14, 18 August 2009 (UTC)