User talk:Soonadracula

Hi! welcome to Wikipedia!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:


 * Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try How to edit a page.
 * To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use 	 ~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type (3 tildes).
 * You can experiment in the test area.
 * You can get help at the Help Desk
 * Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines, Neutral point of view, Civility, What Wikipedia is not

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at New user log.

-- utcursch | talk to me

Image:Makkah53.JPG
Hi, I notice that this photo do not have a source. Where did you get it and why do you claim it is public domain? Thuresson 21:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Image:3amro--deyab-reigon.gif has been listed for deletion
Please indicate the source of Image:Jaguar Stype front.JPG. dbenbenn | talk 20:33, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

Please check your images
I noticed that you have some images in the category Category:Images with unknown source. Due to the vast number of images in this category (12000+), and the fact that, lacking a source, they present considerable copyright uncertanty, Jimbo has stated, and added to the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, "Images in category "Images with unknown source" or "Images with unknown copyright status" which have been in the category for more than 7 days, regardless of when uploaded." This means the images can, and will, be deleted with no notice. To see a list of all the images you've uploaded(at least, under this username), review the upload log. You might also find User:Pearle/by-author-Category:Images_with_unknown_source.txt to be useful(search for your username). If you have any questions, please let me know. JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:04, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

Burj Dubai photos to the Commons
Hi, Soonadracula. I've been following the photos you're posting of the construction of the Burj Dubai. Fascinating stuff! Since you're putting them in the public domain, would you be willing to upload them to the Wikimedia Commons instead? The upload process is the same, and you can use the same  syntax to put the image into articles. The main benefit is that it allows other Sister projects use the images, too. Thank you for sharing the photos, in any case! &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-10-23 23:55:52Z


 * Great new photo; thanks again! &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-02 21:27:55Z

Burj Dubai photos
Hi there, just wanted to say thank you for your great Burj Dubai photos. Keep 'em coming! :-) Peter S. 09:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi Soonadracula, thank you for your photos. They are the closest I can be to the development of such an extraordinary feat of human engineering. I really look forward to seeing more of them. Domentolen 01:46, 8 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the new photo _b Domentolen 06:39, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Nx5f00.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nx5f00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 12:19, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Images
Hi, this page is your list of uploaded images. Many of them aren't labelled... could you tell us what each one is? If we don't know what they are we can't make them to be useful. Thanks. gren グレン 05:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:9405staracb1.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:9405staracb1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Newrender.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Newrender.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. joturn e r 13:51, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Burj_dubai_render_comparison.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Burj_dubai_render_comparison.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 12:29, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Burj2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Burj2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 00:20, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Hussein.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hussein.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Sep18389.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sep18389.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 20:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

File:329121.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:329121.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 08:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Romeo no.3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Romeo no.3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Romeo no.3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Romeo no.3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:16, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mohamed hassanein heikal.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mohamed hassanein heikal.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jose Bartolo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jose Bartolo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jose Bartolo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)