User talk:Soosim/Archive 3

Please comment on Talk:Levomefolic acid
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Levomefolic acid. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

RFC Feedback
Looking for more feedback from uninvolved parties for an RFC I posted at the page ALCAT test. The discussion is here: Talk:ALCAT test. Many thanks. Plot Spoiler (talk) 19:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Syrian civil war
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Syrian civil war. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Can you explain you comment
That the Guardian newspaper is not a reliable source? And plese do not revert again. Apart from WP:3RR, reverting a reliable source can be considered unconstructive. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:09, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * ah, dr k. i did NOT NOT NOT say that the guardian is not reliable. if you read all three of my comments, i say the same thing each time. a letter to the editor is not RS. the guardian is fine. the LTE is a problem. go see the talk page for the mikis article. and we can discuss it there. thanks! Soosim (talk) 16:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, Soosim, your edit removed the guardian reference. If the Guardian is a reliable source why did you remove it? And actually you removed it twice and you also edit-warred to remove it. Can you explain? Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  16:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. I thought it was an article, not a letter to the editor. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:00, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 * dr k - i am so sorry if i was not clear. the guardian reference is to a letter to the editor. a letter to the editor is not RS. i hope that was clear. let me know, k? Soosim (talk) 16:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Ok. Now I see. Fine. So you have no idea who Theodorakis is and you could not not find a reference supporting that he is famous so you removed the "famous" adjective. You also did not bother to Google that he is the best known living composer of Greece. Well, I did, and it was not that difficult to find references for that. So next time please do not delete links which do not work. Try tagging or using Google search instead. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:52, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * i accept your apology. Soosim (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid you did not understand what I wrote. There is nothing to apologise for and obviously I did not apologise. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 19:01, 1 November 2012 (UTC)


 * oh, then i am sorry. i surely thought you were apologizing for your inability to understand the difference between an RS article and someone's LTE. so, therefore, it is i who apologize to you for assuming that you were being courteous. i see from your above comment, that i was indeed wrong. Soosim (talk) 08:41, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll overlook your false apologies and all the other jazz. The fact remains that not only you removed a dead link but you also removed the fact supported by the dead link: "He is viewed as Greece's best-known living composer". That was a completely inappropriate removal. As you may realise when a link goes dead we do not erase either the link or the fact that the link supported. Instead we try to repair the link or, failing that, find another link which supports the fact. If you cannot repair a link or find a new link, you ask people for help. So even though I did not know what "LTE" meant in your edit summary regarding the Guardian reference, I still had a perfectly valid reason to revert you based on the fact that you erased a dead link and its supported fact. As far as the "letter to the editor" link, that's a red herring. Everyone knows that Mikis is world-famous, so even though that particular reference was not reliable you should have left that fact in the article instead of erasing it and ask other people for help if you could not find another reference. And I know perfectly well the difference between a reliable source and a letter to the editor. I simply did not understand your edit-summary when you wrote "LTE". I did not realise what "LTE" was and your accusation: for your inability to understand the difference between an RS article and someone's LTE, is patently unfair and flies in the face of reality. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις  08:59, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * dr k - i am very fond of jazz and herring and flying. thank you again for helping me be a better wikipedia editor. fyi, imho, i really love your "Everyone knows that Mikis is world-famous". so silly of me not to know that. i think i was too involved in jazz, herring and flying. happens. Soosim (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * You have a great sense of humour Soosim. There may yet be hope. :) Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Toddst1 (talk) 17:27, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Croc story
Beware that per AE restrictions nobody is allowed to add new conspiracy theories without proposing them on the talk page first. I suggest you self revert and do that instead. Tijfo098 (talk) 08:14, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Furthermore this is not a conspiracy theory. Marokwitz (talk) 08:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * oops, didn't understand the AE restrictions. Soosim (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)


 * actually - i don't even see those AE restrictions. i don't see them on the talk page, nor on the edit page. maybe it should be made more clear? Soosim (talk) 08:27, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "No editor may add or readd any alleged instance of a conspiracy theory, unless such addition or readdition has been proposed on this talk page at least 48 hours in advance, and either [...]" Tijfo098 (talk) 08:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * yes, but where is that written? that was my point. Soosim (talk) 08:46, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * On the large template on the talk page. Now also in the edit notice. Tijfo098 (talk) 16:24, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greta Berlin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijackings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Dr.K.. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mikis Theodorakis without a valid reason or because you did not understand what you were doing. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you asked other editors on the talkpage before doing something similar again. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. Thank you. ''The information is included in Mikis' biographies which I supplied. They were also already cited in the next sentence which you did not read: Theodorakis's fascination with music began in early childhood; he taught himself to write his first songs without access to musical instruments. In Patras[26] and Pyrgos[27] he took his first music lessons, and in Tripoli, Peloponnese,[28] he gave his first concert at the age of seventeen.

For the last time please do not remove information again from the article. '' I will AGF that you did not want to vandalise the article. But it really does not matter. If one is careless or unable to understand how things work in the article and keep removing valid information repeatedly they also edit the article disruptively and in the end they will have to be blocked. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


 * hi doc k - i did give you a reason. the information was unsourced. and then, mysteriously, after i did it, you went and found sources for the article. so, again, i thank you for making wikipedia a better place by actually using RS for material written, especially in BLPs. and thanks for the AGF warning. i am improving the article. so i hope you are not referring to yourself about vandalism. writing content without RS, i suppose, is indeed a form of vandalism too. let's be careful out there. Soosim (talk) 06:21, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I just told you that the content you vandalised already HAD sources BEFORE I added any new ones. I guess you must be a bit confused because you don't know that you are vandalising and you are more confused also calling me a vandal. I already told you above that the material you removed had sources already BEFORE I added any new ones. So you removed sourced material. That is vandalism. I know you didn't really mean it because you didn't know what you were doing. But still be more careful before you become a vandal by mistake again. Thanks. Read my message again please. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 06:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)


 * i did read your message carefully. thanks. but as i mentioned, what i saw were the facts: only after i tried to improve the article, did you actually come up with the sources for the various statements on that page. and, if you go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mikis_Theodorakis#Suggested_material you will see that the vast majority of comments are in my favor. strange you choose one that wasn't. oh well. Soosim (talk) 08:11, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Harvey Wasserman
Dear Soosim, This article is one of a number or articles that Qworty is treating this way. It seems to be an attack on me ant my work in general, and it is characterized by wholesale deletion of text under the claim "unsourced", including bibliographies with books by both major and minor presses, with ISBN numbers. I really don't know what to do about it; i would welcome advise.Rosencomet (talk) 07:54, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * you have to just revert his edits. if he starts an edit war, then take it to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:AN/EW Soosim (talk) 16:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of official languages by state
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of official languages by state. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Dale Bozzio
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Dale Bozzio. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Amiram Goldblum
Goldblum is sabotaging this article himself. Rastiniak is his infantile "pen name" and the 132.64.165.121 IP number is his own private IP at the Hebrew University. Goldblum has been bragging for weeks that HE personally initiated and ran the "apartheid pseudo-poll" that smeared Israel, yet here he is suddenly pretending he had nothing to do with it. He is a pathetic liar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.3.193.217 (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Goldblum created the infamous "apartheid poll" against Israel that was designed to falsely suggest that the majority of Israelis favor an apartheid-like state akin to South Africa in the 1980's. However, numerous Israeli pundits such as Ma'ariv's Ben Dror Yemini who is liberal progreesive have denounced the poll as being deliberately made to bring out an outcome that falsifies the Palestinian propaganda goal of trying to suggest that democratic Israel is a totalitarian propaganda state. It should be noted that the Palestinians are a military dictatorship and not democratic and practice real apartheid against Jews whereas 20% of Israel's population are Israel Arabs who live there with full democratic rights the same as Jews. In Israel Arab-Israeli ciitznes serve as police officers, judges,get affirmative action programs in the univrsities, own businesses the same as any other Israeli. Israel's Supreme Court has an Arab-Israeli judge and several Arab-Israelis are voting members of Israel's parliament. GOldblum has routinely tried to use deceptive reporting and academically non-viable means to try and encourage the state be dismatled at a Jewish homeland or to support outside Arab irredentist groups. <http://isracampus.org.il/third%20level%20pages/HebrewU%20-%20Haaretz%20Editor%20calls%20Amiram%20Goldblum%20a%20biased%20radical.htm> <http://isracampus.org.il/third%20level%20pages/HebrewU%20-%20Amiram%20Goldblum%20must%20apologize%20for%20slandering%20Israel.htm>


 * thank you for your comments. i have contacted other editors to help with the process. Soosim (talk) 16:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Anti-Israel POV and vandalism
This important information was removed from an article by Pluto2012, despite he is the only one who inserted repeated information about territorial and demographic changes. Perhaps you could restore the missing content and finish this nonsense. Thanks.--201.231.95.189 (talk) 17:54, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Runtsh*t
There are indeed well over 1000 identified Runtsh*t socks; nearly 1700, by my count. Most of the edits have been hidden; but that user's pattern of editing, and choice of username, were characteristic. The edits are usually, like these [ed note: 'these' refers to edits at the Amiram Goldblum page], done via a proxy server (though some have been traced to computers on the University of Haifa server), which makes certainty difficult, and I have only marked this account [ed note: 'this account' refers to the banned user User:Friends of soosim and has nothing to do with Soosim]] as "suspected". But I would be prepared to bet that a checkuser on obvious Runtsh*t sock My tricycle would establish the identity of these two accounts. חג חנוכה סמח. RolandR (talk) 19:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * thanks roland for your enlightening discussion of the runt and the university of haifa - who knew? (i made some changes and added some notes to your comments lest anyone be confused.) Soosim (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, any ambiguity was entirely unintentional. I certainly did not wish or mean to imply that you were in any way responsible for the Friends of soosim (note corrected spelling) account. RolandR (talk) 08:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)


 * exactly. Soosim (talk) 08:27, 10 December 2012 (UTC)#
 * And see the discussion at User_talk:Elockid, which confirms my suspicions]. RolandR (talk) 08:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Joan Crawford
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Joan Crawford. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Koch brothers
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Koch brothers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

"removing shrubbery covering a structure that could be used as an arms smuggling tunnel or to cover terrorists shooting at the IDF"
I think you have cited the wrong source at Rachel Corrie + ISM. It doesn't appear to be that BBC article or Mother Jones. Also terrorist should probably be in quotes in both Wiki-articles. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap"> Sean.hoyland  - talk 16:01, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * you scared me...it is in the BBC article, second section with the subtitle 'Pushed backwards' - second paragraph there. Soosim (talk) 05:50, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I saw that but I don't think that is the right source. The BBC article says "The Israeli authorities said at the time that demolitions were necessary because Palestinian gunmen used the structures as cover to shoot at their troops patrolling in the area, or to conceal arms-smuggling tunnels under the Gaza-Egypt border." but you have directly quoted something else that included the words shrubbery and terrorists, 2 things not often seen together in a report, like herbal garden and wrestler, hence it caught my eye. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 4px 1px 3px;white-space:nowrap"> Sean.hoyland  - talk 06:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Tulip love
It's pretty dreadful, when you have seen it you might think it's easier to start from scratch. I'll post here soon <b style="font-family:chiller; color:red;"> Jimfbleak - </b> talk to me?  13:17, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox musical artist
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox musical artist. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Mondoweiss
Regarding this deletion of sourced material. Could you please explain your rationale on the talk page? Your edit summary "doesn't the redirect go this article anyway?" doesn't bear any relation to the ongoing discussion about the material on the talk page, and I am not sure how the comment relates to the material you deleted or how it is relevant to Wikipedia policy. Dlv999 (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am seriously considering taking you to AE for that edit. I haven't decided yet, but if it is repeated then you will have made the decision for me. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap"> nableezy  - 19:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)


 * please do, nableezy. just so you can say you did it. why be vindictive? i said i thought it was what it was, i said i was sorry if i was wrong, and it was corrected. but go ahead, if it makes you feel better. Soosim (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Urgent
Romayan (talk) 20:27, 26 January 2013 (UTC) Hi Soosim! I want to discuss something with you in private. Could you please contact me via e-mail? romayan at mail dot ru. Thanks!
 * is it wiki related? you can just send an email through wiki, no? Soosim (talk) 08:03, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (people). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Hazon Yeshaya Humanitarian Network
Greetings, Soosim. I can assure you that, although some of the cited reference reads like a promo, it is definitely not paid. But my question is, why did you remove the refs from Carmei Ha'Ir? Although it is promotional (and no-profit at that), it does offer the Wikipedia reader information (and photographs) that put things in context, ie, what a non-profit like Hazon (now Carmei) actually does. Kind regards, --@Efrat (talk) 14:11, 29 January 2013 (UTC)


 * efrat - see: SELFPROMOTE (which talks about not doing that. wiki is not an advertising place); also:  Organizations (which says, in part:  An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability. All content must be verifiable. If no independent, third-party, reliable sources can be found on a topic, then Wikipedia should not have an article on it.)  hope this helps.  Soosim (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

RfC input needed
Hi. You've been selected at random from WP:FRS, where you are listed as an editor willing to help with RfCs related to biographical articles. If you have time, could you provide your input to an RfC here involving issues of libel and defmation in relation to author Jared Diamond. Cheers. --Noleander (talk) 03:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Screenshot of naomi chazan, pages 79-80.png
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of naomi chazan, pages 79-80.png, which you've sourced to naomi chazan, pages 79-80. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:BDS sewer system.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BDS sewer system.png, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Sfard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:15, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

AMIA Bombing
Other Opinions addition

You have taken down my piece - your reason being that the report does not mention Hunter. It does actually - did you read it ? Can you indicate how I may enter a reference to this report on the page. What rules do I need to follow ?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johanne Johannes (talk • contribs) 12:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * hi johannes - first, be sure to sign your posts with four tildes (four of these: ~). secondly, i read and searched the report at the link you provided. hunter's name is non-existent. i did find a few references to the ATF, but nothing like what you wrote. can you tell me what page it is on? also, we generally need a third-party reliable source, not original research for information. thanks Soosim (talk) 16:19, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Note
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks"> Hello Soosim, Sm8900 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

thanks for your support at the talk page for Jerusalem. feel free to be in touch. thanks. --Steve, Sm8900 (talk) 19:47, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Jerusalem moderation
Hi there Soosim! I see you made a post at Talk:Jerusalem/2013 RfC discussion. Are you interested in joining the discussion as a participant? Just let me know if you are. Best — <span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius on tour  ♪ talk ♪ 07:00, 1 March 2013 (UTC)


 * i have followed the entire discussion from the beginning. i don't have the time as some of my colleagues apparently do, to spend on this. to me, brevity and honesty is key. so, in this case, Jerusalem is the capital of Israel, though many (some? most?) countries do not recognize it as such. In addition, the Palestinian Authority has stated that Jerusalem will be the capital of the future state of Palestine.

but, you guys go ahead and bleed thousands of words on it, and i will watch. and when i can, i will comment! Soosim (talk) 11:03, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Criticism of Amnesty International (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spectator


 * Criticism of Human Rights Watch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Spectator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

AE
I have made a request for enforcement at WP:AE in relation to your editing. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 06:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * nice. thanks! Soosim (talk) 06:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you get that idiot vandal RolandR to stop vandalizing the Talk entry on Amiram Goldblum? He should be blocked from editing. He removed essential information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marv Marvin (talk • contribs) 16:51, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for 4 days. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped. For violation of the WP:ARBPIA 1RR restriction at two different articles. Per a complaint at Arbitration enforcement. EdJohnston (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Vital articles/Expanded. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Consecutive edits
"A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert." See WP:3RR. Zerotalk 11:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Incidentally my German is not great, so if you think I am not reading the paper of Socim correctly please speak up. Zerotalk 11:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion
Hello, Soosim. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CarolMooreDC 17:08, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fort Hood shooting. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 03:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

 * thanks for the cupcake. i am always looking for an excuse to go off my diet. no problem. as for 'the truth', just use "RS" (reliable sources) and fill his page and any other page with the proper information. happy to help if you need it. Soosim (talk) 08:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oxfam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blockade of Gaza (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:George Maharis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:George Maharis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 07:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Please be careful
I am sure this edit was an accident, but it removed my reply to another user, and someone else's request: please be careful on other people's talk pages. JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * weird. i clicked on the "click here to leave me a message" link at the top of your page, filled in the info, etc. and pressed save. very strange. sorry. Soosim (talk) 09:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Very odd - there doesn't seem to have been an edit conflict. One of my favourite cartoons shows a man sitting in front of a desktop computer box. Its lid has blown open, and his hair and eyebrows have been blown back, obviously by a powerful explosion. Caption: "It's never done that before!" What was your message? If it was about Iyad Burnat, I see Nawlinwiki has semi-protected it. JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * yes, it was my message about iyad burnat. but that was yesterday. nothing today. Soosim (talk) 10:08, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring behavior on five articles
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. In regards to my talk page comments on:
 * Talk:Iyad_Burnat (an article you already nominated for deletion): Listing four edits under Section "soosim's last series of edits" and this diff
 * Talk:Students for Justice in Palestine this diff where I protest your edit warring habits.
 * Talk:Student activism in the BDS movement (an article you already nominated for deletion; it does need merging back to Students for Justice in Palestine but perhaps your edit warring on that article led to its creation in the first place?): this diff where I protest your edit warring habits.
 * Revert that removed two new WP:RS examples of separation barriers in order to ensure the remaining one paragraph examples were separate sections; refusal to put back new material when asked.
 * Removal of all but one external link because I removed an attack link in a WP:BLP per policy with the insulting edit summary:  seems that according to carol, all of these are in violation of wp:blp and RS, etc.)

Keep in mind that while violating the one-revert or three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. CarolMooreDC &#x1f5fd; 19:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * hi carol - thanks for stopping by my talk page again. if you look carefully, all of my edits were summarized in the edit summary and i have been active on the talk pages as well. so, not sure what you are really saying, but thanks for repeating it all here (as you have already said most - if not all - of the above, elsewhere. p.s. thanks for the graphic - nice touch (adds some color to the page!). Soosim (talk) 05:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * And then there's putting back full section headers on Separation barrier claiming "no consensus" when two editors on the talk page and the editor who removed them and put in bold section headers all agreed they were WP:Undue. And your reason for reverting "not an accurate reflection of the content of the article" - one paragraph on a topic with minor WP:RS rarely merit full sections in any article. You need to review policy more often and your POV less often.  CarolMooreDC &#x1f5fd; 18:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Rollback
It's not a perfect world. Fear not! Continue to be scrupulously fair and revert vandalism. Make a special effort to be considerate and avoid edit warring and you will get a very long way. --Fil e  Éireann 12:58, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

URL question
Since you didn't respond when your responded to another thread (which will deal with later), perhaps you missed this question? Talk:Students_for_Justice_in_Palestine CarolMooreDC &#x1f5fd; 15:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * i did miss the question, and thanks, so i answered you there. Soosim (talk) 07:33, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Rashad Hussain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Islamic Jihad


 * Students for Justice in Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Sabra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Children in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
Hi Soosim, regarding your addition to the talk page, I would kindly ask you to remove it from the page as it is not related to the purpose of the page: discussing improvements to the article. If you must you can add the comment to the editor's talk page. If you want some advice, I can assure you that adding a cn tag is not counted as a revert under the 1rr regulations (apart from in the specific case that someone has previously removed the tag from the same position). Dlv999 (talk) 17:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Or strike it since I've replied. I must admit I've been losing my temper at so many of your inaccurate/ill informed criticisms. Why not just look at the relevant policy page from now on and make sure you have it right. That's what I do when I'm not quite sure or need a review. Quoting the policy is even more effective in getting people on the same page - or at least make sure they're discussing the same issue. CarolMooreDC &#x1f5fd; 18:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * the policy says nothing about adding "cn" which was an edit to something which had been edited previously. but,that is why i was asking not accusing. chill out my friends, chill out. life is good. Soosim (talk) 05:09, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Adding anything is not a revert, i.e., because per Edit warring "A revert means undoing the actions of another editor." (now it could be vandalism if a bunch of junk or an excessive number of tags (like one after every sentence in a section, instead of a section tag) or whatever was added, but that's a separate issue.) CarolMooreDC &#x1f5fd; 05:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Soosim, regarding these comments, this is the second time in a week that you have used the talk page of this article to make inappropriate remarks about another editor. Article talk pages are not for engaging in feuds with other editors, it is for discussing content only. Your comment is about another editor it is inappropriate and disruptive, please self revert. To address the actual comment, discussing the edits of another editor is not a personal attack, it is a perfectly legitimate response top bold edit and falls within the remit of discussing article content. Your comments on the other hand are not content related and are purely disruptive to the purposes of the talk page. Dlv999 (talk) 09:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Yet another warning
You are headed very rapidly towards a topic ban. Take for example your edit at Israel Eldad where you claimed that you "removed all four references since none of them refer to eldad himself". Did you think that nobody was going to check? Actually three of the five sources you removed name Eldad explicitly. What is your excuse? Zerotalk 11:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * i checked each one, and did a search for eldad, for scheib, sheib, schieb, shieb, and found nothing. of course, i am glad someone checks. but that's strange. also, several of the sources were not RS (like a link to another wiki article?) Soosim (talk) 12:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Bowyer Bell's article has "Sheib" twice and "Eldad" 9 times, and supports the claim precisely. So does Ilan's book. Zerotalk 13:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
 * sorry again - i did a full search of each. Soosim (talk) 13:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Location of Osama bin Laden
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Location of Osama bin Laden. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 08:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Yochai Porat Volunteer project
(Adom David Magen). You advised me to write the article about the namesake of the Yochai Porat Volunteer Project, and to consult with you about. Also note, that the article is always open to editing as it takes shape. I intend to get the rights to use a photo of Yochai and Senator Hiliary Clinton.... Sadly I've seem to mined out all the data on this young man as he was assassinated by a terrorist in the prime of his young life.. Sources seem to be the IDF Eugloy, a site maintained by his surviving kin and his students, as well as Magden David Adom itself.

Your edits on the Goldblum article
Please refrain from introducing information that has no backing. I understand your deep need to smear Goldblum. but try to stick to facts, not to your imagination. I realize that this is not easy for you. רסטיניאק (talk) 08:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק

prof goldblum - what was not factual about what was placed there? the LA times article quoted you and your neighbors. didn't you read the article? I think you need to self-revert. Soosim (talk) 08:42, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Please prevent Goldblum from his oonstant attempts to attack Prof. Plaut on WIki pages. In fact Plaut has never "smeared" Goldblum at all about anything and has barely ever even mentioned Goldblum in his commentaries. Goldblum is upset that various web sites cite accurate reports about him from teh LA Times, Maariv, and other mainstream media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shemtov6 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of vegetarians
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of vegetarians. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 10:24, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.


 * I didn't raise the thread at COIN but this was posted to your userpage. Am moving it here. Stalwart 111  11:36, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

AE
New discussion regarding you at AE, here. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 04:19, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Seems to be wrong address. Try  this one. Zerotalk 08:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Promoting family members and an election campaign ?
I wonder if this is an example of promoting family members of Soosim. Or that, and is that a family collaboration ? Many of his nearly 70 edits during the last months on David Draiman seem to come out of intimate personal knowledge, not out of general interest in the Disturbed (band) Chicago heavy metal group. I do not think that this warrnats another WP:COIN discussion, but it may serve to remind that there have been also non I/P subjects where Soosim may have promoted against WP guidelines, as well as of him having double standards, and I am sure that this message gets through. It may also not be relevant to the current process at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcementרסטיניאק (talk) 09:54, 29 May 2013 (UTC)רסטיניאק

May 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts (see Sockpuppet investigations/Soosim/Archive). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  21:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * There is technical and behavioural evidence that say otherwise, and a quick review of that evidence makes it a little bit obvious. Honesty is a requirement, even though we're just a bunch of atoms on the other end of the wire (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 10:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ok, there is nothing I can do than, I suppose. we are not related, and I have no sockpuppet inclinations. honest. I do not believe in breaking - or bending - the rules. but if one starts with a faulty assumption, one ends up with an incorrect conclusion. it's just the way it is. Soosim (talk) 11:25, 31 May 2013 (UTC)