User talk:Sophiabesson

July 2019
Hello, I'm Everedux. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Why Don't We— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Everedux  (talk)  01:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Why Don't We. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Everedux  (talk)  01:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Why Don't We, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Why Don't We was changed by Sophiabesson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958527 on 2019-07-24T01:18:45+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Why Don't We. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  01:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Lofty   abyss  01:23, 24 July 2019 (UTC)