User talk:Sophie AS.

Welcome!
Hello, Sophie AS., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Romaine (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: The project page can be found at: Benelux Education Program/Maastricht University/FPN Historical Book Review Spring 2017. Romaine (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Feedback on your article
Hello Sophie AS., Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. I especially will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay. I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article before our next meeting. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 10:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Intro sentence: Please check more existing Wikipedia articles, we make the subject in the first sentence bold and mention "English" before the translation of the title. I would suggest to rewrite your intro sentence with the same components but in a different order, and start with the title, followed by "is a book...".
 * Links: Missing! Please look for keywords in your article and link them to other Wikipedia articles.
 * Headers: The article is about a book, so you do not need to mention "of the book" everywhere. Where possible, shorter is better.
 * References: Missing!
 * Context/timeframe: Good start! Can be expanded with how in that time people looked at this subject.
 * How was the book received: In the section about the Reactions to the book I miss the reactions!
 * Hello Sophie AS., Thank you for improving your article! Last week we specifically asked to make sure you add sources/references to your article, because that is one of the most important parts of a Wikipedia article. We also wanted to make sure the intro sentence/section is ready. Let's see how it is going now.
 * Intro sentence: See above!
 * Links: Still waiting for improvements!
 * Headers: Thank you for making the headers shorter. I would suggest you change "Reactions" to "Reception".
 * References: This was the task for this week's session! Please catch up as quickly as possible!
 * Context/timeframe: More context please
 * How was the book received: More context please
 * You are running behind on schedule, please catch up and improve your article! Romaine (talk) 02:17, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Sophie AS., I add the image of the book to your sandbox article. Romaine (talk) 05:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)